10-Q: Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]
Published on
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
| x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 033-37587
Pruco Life Insurance Company
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Arizona | 22-1944557 | |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
213 Washington Street, Newark, New Jersey 07102
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(973) 802-6000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | x | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of November 14, 2011, 250,000 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock (par value $10), were outstanding. As of such date, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey Corporation, owned all of the Registrant’s Common Stock.
Pruco Life Insurance Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) on Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain of the statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including but not limited to those in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “includes,” “plans,” “assumes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “should,” “will,” “shall” or variations of such words are generally part of forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects upon Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries will be those anticipated by management. These forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and there are certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ, possibly materially, from expectations or estimates reflected in such forward-looking statements, including, among others: (1) general economic, market and political conditions, including the performance and fluctuations of fixed income, equity, real estate and other financial markets; (2) the availability and cost of additional debt or equity capital or external financing for our operations; (3) interest rate fluctuations or prolonged periods of low interest rates; (4) the degree to which we choose not to hedge risks, or the potential ineffectiveness or insufficiency of hedging or risk management strategies we do implement, with regard to variable annuity or other product guarantees; (5) any inability to access our credit facilities; (6) re-estimates of our reserves for future policy benefits and claims; (7) differences between actual experience regarding mortality, morbidity, persistency, surrender experience, interest rates or market returns and the assumptions we use in pricing our products, establishing liabilities and reserves or for other purposes; (8) changes in our assumptions related to deferred policy acquisition costs; (9) changes in our financial strength or credit ratings; (10) statutory reserve requirements associated with term and universal life insurance policies under Regulation XXX and Guideline AXXX; (11) investment losses, defaults and counterparty non-performance; (12) competition in our product lines and for personnel; (13) difficulties in marketing and distributing products through current or future distribution channels; (14) changes in tax law; (15) regulatory or legislative changes, including the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; (16) inability to protect our intellectual property rights or claims of infringement of the intellectual property rights of others; (17) adverse determinations in litigation or regulatory matters and our exposure to contingent liabilities; (18) domestic or international military actions, natural or man-made disasters including terrorist activities or pandemic disease, or other events resulting in catastrophic loss of life; (19) ineffectiveness of risk management policies and procedures in identifying, monitoring and managing risks; (20) interruption in telecommunication, information technology or other operational systems or failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data on such systems; and (21) changes in statutory or U.S. GAAP accounting principles, practices or policies. Pruco Life Insurance Company does not intend, and is under no obligation, to update any particular forward-looking statement included in this document. See “Risk Factors” included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for discussion of certain risks relating to our businesses.
3
Table of Contents
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands, except share amounts)
| September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
| ASSETS |
||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost: 2011 – $5,627,161; 2010 – $5,701,829) |
$ | 6,083,570 | $ | 6,042,303 | ||||
| Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2011 – $9,969; 2010 – $17,964) |
8,117 | 19,407 | ||||||
| Trading account assets, at fair value |
30,952 | 22,705 | ||||||
| Policy loans |
1,047,090 | 1,061,607 | ||||||
| Short-term investments |
396,104 | 246,904 | ||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
1,372,615 | 1,275,022 | ||||||
| Other long-term investments |
239,498 | 131,994 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total investments |
9,177,946 | 8,799,942 | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
241,128 | 364,999 | ||||||
| Deferred policy acquisition costs |
2,975,388 | 3,377,557 | ||||||
| Accrued investment income |
92,416 | 92,806 | ||||||
| Reinsurance recoverables |
5,757,029 | 2,727,161 | ||||||
| Receivables from parents and affiliates |
206,470 | 249,339 | ||||||
| Deferred sales inducements |
480,479 | 537,943 | ||||||
| Other assets |
37,545 | 53,375 | ||||||
| Separate account assets |
52,129,147 | 43,269,091 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 71,097,548 | $ | 59,472,213 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
| LIABILITIES |
||||||||
| Policyholders’ account balances |
$ | 7,751,730 | $ | 7,509,169 | ||||
| Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities |
5,258,119 | 3,327,549 | ||||||
| Cash collateral for loaned securities |
146,549 | 76,574 | ||||||
| Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
41,169 | 2,957 | ||||||
| Income taxes payable |
144,536 | 548,280 | ||||||
| Short-term debt to affiliates |
50,000 | — | ||||||
| Long-term debt to affiliates |
1,095,000 | 895,000 | ||||||
| Payables to parent and affiliates |
10,654 | 41,910 | ||||||
| Other liabilities |
1,415,538 | 475,489 | ||||||
| Separate account liabilities |
52,129,147 | 43,269,091 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total liabilities |
68,042,442 | 56,146,019 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (See Note 6) |
||||||||
| EQUITY |
||||||||
| Common stock, ($10 par value; 1,000,000 shares, authorized; 250,000 shares, issued and outstanding) |
2,500 | 2,500 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
832,477 | 792,226 | ||||||
| Retained earnings |
1,998,151 | 2,370,525 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income |
221,977 | 160,943 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total equity |
3,055,106 | 3,326,194 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
$ | 71,097,548 | $ | 59,472,213 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Table of Contents
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands)
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
| Premiums |
$ | 16,129 | $ | 18,330 | $ | 49,686 | $ | 54,098 | ||||||||
| Policy charges and fee income |
244,307 | 133,505 | 820,604 | 498,867 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
107,455 | 110,491 | 327,933 | 326,668 | ||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees |
52,901 | 20,153 | 147,969 | 50,516 | ||||||||||||
| Other income |
12,366 | 14,088 | 31,940 | 38,701 | ||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net: |
||||||||||||||||
| Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities |
(17,634 | ) | (24,983 | ) | (47,634 | ) | (90,561 | ) | ||||||||
| Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to Other Comprehensive Income |
15,541 | 21,822 | 41,542 | 82,041 | ||||||||||||
| Other realized investment gains (losses), net |
208,063 | 20,605 | 239,811 | 74,621 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total realized investment gains (losses), net |
205,971 | 17,444 | 233,719 | 66,101 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total revenues |
639,129 | 314,011 | 1,611,851 | 1,034,951 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| BENEFITS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
| Policyholders’ benefits |
187,648 | (31,019 | ) | 302,481 | 131,249 | |||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances |
291,321 | 34,850 | 450,590 | 234,554 | ||||||||||||
| Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs |
812,067 | (168,529 | ) | 1,075,795 | 192,423 | |||||||||||
| General, administrative and other expenses |
128,645 | 87,587 | 389,741 | 246,324 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total benefits and expenses |
1,419,681 | (77,111 | ) | 2,218,607 | 804,550 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(780,552 | ) | 391,122 | (606,756 | ) | 230,401 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) |
(310,584 | ) | 114,148 | (274,634 | ) | 40,996 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (469,968 | ) | $ | 276,974 | $ | (332,122 | ) | $ | 189,405 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of taxes (1) |
43,990 | 75,939 | 61,034 | 137,208 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | (425,978 | ) | $ | 352,913 | $ | (271,088 | ) | $ | 326,613 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Amounts are net of tax expense of $24 million and $41 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $33 million and $74 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
5
Table of Contents
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands)
| Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 792,226 | $ | 2,370,525 | $ | 160,943 | $ | 3,326,194 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
— | — | (332,122 | ) | — | (332,122 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Affiliated Asset Transfers |
— | 40,251 | (40,251 | ) | — | (0 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes |
— | — | — | 32 | 32 | |||||||||||||||
| Change in net unrealized investment gains, net of taxes |
— | — | — | 61,002 | 61,002 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Balance, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 832,477 | $ | 1,998,152 | $ | 221,977 | $ | 3,055,106 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Common Stock |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2009 |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 828,858 | $ | 2,000,457 | $ | 75,767 | $ | 2,907,582 | ||||||||||
| Net income |
— | — | 189,405 | 189,405 | ||||||||||||||||
| Contributed Capital |
— | 10 | — | — | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| Change in foreign currency translation adjustments, net of taxes |
— | — | — | (43 | ) | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Change in net unrealized investment gains, net of taxes |
— | — | — | 137,251 | 137,251 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Balance, September 30, 2010 |
$ | 2,500 | $ | 828,868 | $ | 2,189,862 | $ | 212,975 | $ | 3,234,205 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
6
Table of Contents
Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands)
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | (332,122 | ) | $ | 189,405 | |||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
| Policy charges and fee income |
(212,267 | ) | (123,926 | ) | ||||
| Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances |
450,590 | 234,554 | ||||||
| Realized investment (gains) losses, net |
(233,719 | ) | (66,101 | ) | ||||
| Amortization and other non-cash items |
(10,493 | ) | (15,534 | ) | ||||
| Change in: |
||||||||
| Future policy benefits and other insurance liabilities |
702,610 | 535,835 | ||||||
| Reinsurance recoverables |
(1,664,534 | ) | (471,720 | ) | ||||
| Accrued investment income |
389 | (606 | ) | |||||
| Receivables from parent and affiliates |
39,695 | (38,919 | ) | |||||
| Payables to parent and affiliates |
(40,085 | ) | 13,493 | |||||
| Deferred policy acquisition costs |
419,550 | (497,994 | ) | |||||
| Income taxes payable |
(436,607 | ) | (77,560 | ) | ||||
| Deferred sales inducements |
(227,722 | ) | (158,224 | ) | ||||
| Other, net |
828,688 | (45,789 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Cash flows from (used in) operating activities |
$ | (716,028 | ) | $ | (523,086 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale/maturity/prepayment of: |
||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
$ | 736,820 | $ | 1,290,396 | ||||
| Policy loans |
92,508 | 85,429 | ||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
42,196 | 50,549 | ||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
10,350 | 13,977 | ||||||
| Trading account assets |
— | 1,200 | ||||||
| Payments for the purchase/origination of: |
||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
(634,883 | ) | (1,241,379 | ) | ||||
| Policy loans |
(76,734 | ) | (94,449 | ) | ||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
(134,523 | ) | (241,997 | ) | ||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
(8,446 | ) | (6,437 | ) | ||||
| Notes receivable from parent and affiliates, net |
18,228 | 60,310 | ||||||
| Other long-term investments, net |
(22,314 | ) | (40,244 | ) | ||||
| Short-term investments, net |
(149,241 | ) | (164,748 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Cash flows from (used in) investing activities |
$ | (126,040 | ) | $ | (287,393 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
| Policyholders’ account deposits |
$ | 2,181,188 | $ | 2,281,169 | ||||
| Policyholders’ account withdrawals |
(1,874,756 | ) | (1,547,240 | ) | ||||
| Net change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase and cash collateral for loaned securities |
108,189 | (113,911 | ) | |||||
| Contributed capital |
— | 10 | ||||||
| Net change in financing arrangements (maturities 90 days or less) |
103,575 | 224,075 | ||||||
| Net change in long-term borrowing |
200,000 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Cash flows from (used in) financing activities |
$ | 718,196 | $ | 844,103 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(123,871 | ) | 33,624 | |||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
364,999 | 143,111 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 241,128 | $ | 176,735 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
See Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Table of Contents
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
1. BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Pruco Life Insurance Company, or the “Company,” is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, or “Prudential Insurance,” which in turn is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., or “Prudential Financial.” The Company was organized in 1971 under the laws of the State of Arizona. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities in the District of Columbia, Guam, and in all States except New York.
The Company has three subsidiaries, including one wholly owned life insurance subsidiary, Pruco Life Insurance Company of New Jersey, or “PLNJ,” and two investment subsidiaries formed in 2009 for the purpose of holding certain commercial loan investments. Pruco Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries are together referred to as the Company and all financial information is shown on a consolidated basis.
PLNJ is a stock life insurance company organized in 1982 under the laws of the state of New Jersey. It is licensed to sell life insurance and annuities only in New Jersey and New York.
Beginning in March 2010, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (“PALAC”), an affiliate of the Company, ceased offering its existing variable annuity products and where offered, the companion market value adjustment option to new investors upon the launch of a new product line by the Company. In general, the new product line offers the same optional living benefits and optional death benefits as offered by the Company’s existing variable annuities.
Basis of Presentation
The Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or “U.S. GAAP,” on a basis consistent with reporting interim financial information in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of the Company have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year.
The Company has extensive transactions and relationships with Prudential Insurance and other affiliates, (as more fully described in Note 8 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements). Due to these relationships, it is possible that the terms of these transactions are not the same as those that would result from transactions among unrelated parties. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The most significant estimates include those used in determining deferred policy acquisition costs and related amortization; amortization of sales inducements; value of investments including derivatives and the recognition of other-than-temporary impairments; future policy benefits including guarantees; provision for income taxes and deferred tax assets; and reserves for contingent liabilities, including reserves for losses in connection with unresolved legal matters.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
8
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
The Company’s investments in debt and equity securities include fixed maturities; trading account assets; equity securities; and short-term investments. The accounting policies related to these, as well as commercial mortgage and other loans, are as follows:
Fixed maturities are comprised of bonds, notes and redeemable preferred stock. Fixed maturities classified as “available for sale” are carried at fair value. See Note 4 for additional information regarding the determination of fair value. Interest income, as well as the related amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is included in “Net investment income” under the effective yield method. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, the effective yield is based on estimated cash flows, including prepayment assumptions based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates vary based on assumptions regarding the underlying collateral, including default rates and changes in value. These assumptions can significantly impact income recognition and the amount of other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and other comprehensive income. For high credit quality mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities (those rated AA or above), cash flows are provided quarterly, and the amortized cost and effective yield of the security are adjusted as necessary to reflect historical prepayment experience and changes in estimated future prepayments. The adjustments to amortized cost are recorded as a charge or credit to net investment income in accordance with the retrospective method. For asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities rated below AA, the effective yield is adjusted prospectively for any changes in estimated cash flows. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments. Unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities classified as “available for sale,” net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements and future policy benefits that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”
Equity securities available for sale are comprised of common stock, and non-redeemable preferred stock and are carried at fair value. The associated unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, and the effect on deferred policy acquisition costs, deferred sales inducements and future policy benefits that would result from the realization of unrealized gains and losses, are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” The cost of equity securities is written down to fair value when a decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary. See the discussion below on realized investment gains and losses for a description of the accounting for impairments. Dividends from these investments are recognized in “Net investment income” when declared.
Trading account assets, at fair value, consist primarily of asset-backed securities, perpetual preferred stock and commercial mortgage-backed securities whose fair values are determined consistent with similar instruments described above under “Fixed Maturity Securities.” Realized and unrealized gains and losses for these investments are reported in “Other income.” Interest and dividend income from these investments is reported in “Net investment income.”
Commercial mortgage and other loans consist of commercial mortgage loans, and agricultural loans. Commercial mortgage loans are broken down by class which is based on property type (industrial properties, retail, office, multi-family/apartment, hospitality, and other). Commercial mortgage and other loans originated and held for investment are generally carried at unpaid principal balance, net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and expenses and net of an allowance for losses. Commercial mortgage loans originated within the Company’s commercial mortgage operations include loans held for investment which are reported at amortized cost net of unamortized deferred loan origination fees and expenses and net of an allowance for losses. Commercial mortgage and other loans acquired, including those related to the acquisition of a business, are recorded at fair value when purchased, reflecting any premiums or discounts to unpaid principal balances.
Interest income, as well as prepayment fees and the amortization of the related premiums or discounts, related to commercial mortgage and other loans, are included in “Net investment income.”
Impaired loans include those loans for which it is probable that amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not all be collected. The Company defines “past due” as principal or interest not collected at least 30 days past the scheduled contractual due date. Interest received on loans that are past due, including impaired and non-impaired loans as well as loans that were previously modified in a troubled debt restructuring, is either applied against the principal or reported as net investment income based on the Company’s assessment as to the collectability of the principal. See Note 3 for additional information about the Company’s past due loans.
The Company discontinues accruing interest on loans after the loans become 90 days delinquent as to principal or interest payments, or earlier when the Company has doubts about collectability. When the Company discontinues accruing interest on a loan, any accrued but uncollectible interest on the loan and other loans backed by the same collateral, if any, is charged to interest income in the same period. Generally, a loan is restored to accrual status only after all delinquent interest and principal are brought current and, in the case of loans where the payment of interest has been interrupted for a substantial period, or the loan has been modified, a regular payment performance has been established.
The Company reviews the performance and credit quality of the commercial mortgage and other loan portfolio on an on-going basis. Loans are placed on watch list status based on a predefined set of criteria and are assigned one of three categories. Loans are placed on “early warning” status in cases where, based on the Company’s analysis of the loan’s collateral, the financial situation of the borrower or tenants or other market factors, it is believed a loss of principal or interest could occur. Loans are classified as “closely monitored” when it is determined that there is a collateral deficiency or other credit events that may lead to a potential loss of principal or interest. Loans “not in good standing” are those loans where the Company has concluded that there is a high probability of loss of principal, such as when the loan is delinquent or in the process of foreclosure. As
9
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
described below, in determining the allowance for losses, the Company evaluates each loan on the watch list to determine if it is probable that amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected.
Loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios are measures commonly used to assess the quality of commercial mortgage loans. The loan-to-value ratio compares the amount of the loan to the fair value of the underlying property collateralizing the loan, and is commonly expressed as a percentage. Loan-to-value ratios greater than 100% indicate that the loan amount exceeds the collateral value. A smaller loan-to-value ratio indicates a greater excess of collateral value over the loan amount. The debt service coverage ratio compares a property’s net operating income to its debt service payments. Debt service coverage ratios less than 1.0 times indicate that property operations do not generate enough income to cover the loan’s current debt payments. A larger debt service coverage ratio indicates a greater excess of net operating income over the debt service payments. The values utilized in calculating these ratios are developed as part of the Company’s periodic review of the commercial mortgage loan and agricultural loan portfolio, which includes an internal appraisal of the underlying collateral value. The Company’s periodic review also includes a quality re-rating process, whereby the internal quality rating originally assigned at underwriting is updated based on current loan, property and market information using a proprietary quality rating system. The loan-to-value ratio is the most significant of several inputs used to establish the internal credit rating of a loan which in turn drives the allowance for losses. Other key factors considered in determining the internal credit rating include debt service coverage ratios, amortization, loan term, estimated market value growth rate and volatility for the property type and region. See Note 3 for additional information related to the loan-to-value ratios and debt service coverage ratios related to the Company’s commercial mortgage and agricultural loan portfolios.
Loans are reported at carrying value, and the allowance for losses includes a loan specific reserve for each impaired loan that has a specifically identified loss and a portfolio reserve for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses. For impaired commercial mortgage and other loans, the allowances for losses are determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or based upon the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The portfolio reserves for probable incurred but not specifically identified losses in the commercial mortgage and agricultural loan portfolio segments considers the current credit composition of the portfolio based on an internal quality rating, (as described above). The portfolio reserves are determined using past loan experience, including historical credit migration, loss probability and loss severity factors by property type. Historical credit migration, loss rates and loss severity factors are updated each quarter based on the Company’s actual loan experience, and are considered together with other relevant qualitative factors in making the final portfolio reserve calculations.
The allowance for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans can increase or decrease from period to period based on the factors noted above. “Realized investment gains (losses), net” includes changes in the allowance for losses. “Realized investment gains (losses), net” also includes gains and losses on sales, certain restructurings, and foreclosures.
When a commercial mortgage or other loan is deemed to be uncollectible, any specific valuation allowance associated with the loan is reversed and a direct write down to the carrying amount of the loan is made. The carrying amount of the loan is not adjusted for subsequent recoveries in value.
Commercial mortgage and other loans are occasionally restructured in a troubled debt restructuring. These restructurings generally include one or more of the following: full or partial payoffs outside of the original contract terms: changes to interest rates; extensions of maturity; or additions or modifications to covenants. Additionally, the Company may accept assets in full or partial satisfaction of the debt as part of a troubled debt restructuring. When restructurings occur, they are evaluated individually to determine whether the restructuring or modification constitutes a “troubled debt restructuring” as defined by authoritative accounting guidance. If the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Company has granted a concession, the restructuring, including those that involve a partial payoff or the receipt of assets in full satisfaction of the debt is deemed to be a troubled debt restructuring. Based on the Company’s credit review process described above, these loans generally would have been deemed impaired prior to the troubled debt restructuring, and specific allowances for losses would have been established prior to the determination that a troubled debt restructuring has occurred.
In a troubled debt restructuring where the Company receives assets in full satisfaction of the debt, any specific valuation allowance is reversed and a direct write down of the loan is recorded for the amount of the allowance, and any additional loss, net of recoveries, is recorded for the difference between the fair value of the assets received and the recorded investment in the loan. When assets are received in partial settlement, the same process is followed, and the remaining loan is evaluated prospectively for impairment based on the credit review process noted above. When a loan is restructured in a troubled debt restructuring, the impairment of the loan is remeasured using the modified terms and the loans original effective yield, and the allowance for loss is adjusted accordingly. Subsequent to the modification, income is recognized prospectively based on the modified terms of the loans in accordance with the income recognition policy noted above. Additionally, the loan continues to be subject to the credit review process noted above.
In situations where a loan has been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring and the loan has subsequently defaulted, this factor is considered when evaluating the loan for a specific allowance for losses in accordance with the credit review process noted above.
See Note 3 for additional information about commercial mortgage and other loans that have been restructured in a troubled debt restructuring.
“Short-term investments” primarily consist of highly liquid debt instruments with a maturity of greater than three months and less than twelve months when purchased. These investments are generally carried at fair value and include certain money market investments, short-term debt securities issued by government sponsored entities and other highly liquid debt instruments.
Realized investment gains (losses) are computed using the specific identification method. Realized investment gains and losses are generated from numerous sources, including the sale of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships and other
10
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
types of investments, as well as adjustments to the cost basis of investments for net other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings. Realized investment gains and losses are also generated from prepayment premiums received on private fixed maturity securities, recoveries of principal on previously impaired securities, allowance for losses on commercial mortgage and other loans and fair value changes on embedded derivatives and free-standing derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
The Company’s available for sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed quarterly to identify other-than-temporary impairments in value. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. With regard to available-for-sale equity securities, the Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. When it is determined that a decline in value of an equity security is other-than-temporary, the carrying value of the equity security is reduced to its fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings.
Under the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities, an other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized in earnings for a debt security in an unrealized loss position when an entity either (a) has the intent to sell the debt security or (b) more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. For all debt securities in unrealized loss positions that do not meet either of these two criteria, the guidance requires that the Company analyze its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of projected future cash flows with the amortized cost of the security. The net present value is calculated by discounting the Company’s best estimate of projected future cash flows at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. The Company may use the estimated fair value of collateral as a proxy for the net present value if it believes that the security is dependent on the liquidation of collateral for recovery of its investment. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an other-than-temporary impairment is recognized.
Under the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, when an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security has occurred, the amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings depends on whether the Company intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the debt security meets either of these two criteria, the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the impairment measurement date. For other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities that do not meet these criteria, the net amount recognized in earnings is equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the debt security and its net present value calculated as described above. Any difference between the fair value and the net present value of the debt security at the impairment measurement date is recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss).” Unrealized gains or losses on securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings is tracked as a separate component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).”
For debt securities, the split between the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income and the net amount recognized in earnings is driven principally by assumptions regarding the amount and timing of projected cash flows. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including prepayment assumptions, and are based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates include assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. The Company has developed these estimates using information based on its historical experience as well as using market observable data, such as industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings and other data relevant to the collectability of a security, such as the general payment terms of the security and the security’s position within the capital structure of the issuer.
The new cost basis of an impaired security is not adjusted for subsequent increases in estimated fair value. In periods subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment, the impaired security is accounted for as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. For debt securities, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis may be accreted into net investment income in future periods, including increases in cash flow on a prospective basis.
Asset Administration Fees
The Company receives asset administration fee income from policyholders’ account balances invested in The Prudential Series Funds or, “PSF,” which are a portfolio of mutual fund investments related to the Company’s separate account products. Also, the Company receives fee income calculated on contractholder separate account balances invested in the Advanced Series Trust Funds. In addition, the Company receives fees from policyholders’ account balances invested in funds managed by companies other than affiliates of Prudential Insurance. Asset administration fees are recognized as income when earned.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, financial indices, or the values of securities. Derivative financial instruments generally used by the Company include swaps, futures, forwards and options which are contracted in the over-the-counter market with an affiliate. Derivative positions are carried at fair value, generally by obtaining quoted market prices or through the use of valuation models. Values can be affected by changes in interest rates, financial indices, values of securities, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns, non-performance
11
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
risks and liquidity. Values can also be affected by changes in estimates and assumptions, including those related to counterparty behavior and non-performance risk used in valuation models.
Derivatives are used to manage the characteristics of the Company’s asset/liability mix to manage the interest rate and currency characteristics of assets or liabilities. Additionally, derivatives may be used to seek to reduce exposure to interest rate, credit, foreign currency and equity risks associated with assets held or expected to be purchased or sold, and liabilities incurred or expected to be incurred.
Derivatives are recorded either as assets, within “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” except for embedded derivatives, which are recorded with the associated host contract. The Company nets the fair value of all derivative financial instruments with its affiliated counterparty for which a master netting arrangement has been executed. As discussed below and in Note 5, all realized and unrealized changes in fair value of derivatives, with the exception of the effective portion of cash flow hedges are recorded in current earnings. Cash flows from these derivatives are reported in the operating and investing activities sections in the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows based on the nature and purpose of the derivative.
The Company designates derivatives as either (1) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow” hedge), or (2) a derivative that does not qualify for hedge accounting.
To qualify for hedge accounting treatment, a derivative must be highly effective in mitigating the designated risk of the hedged item. Effectiveness of the hedge is formally assessed at inception and throughout the life of the hedging relationship. Even if a derivative qualifies for hedge accounting treatment, there may be an element of ineffectiveness of the hedge. Under such circumstances, the ineffective portion is recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
The Company formally documents at inception all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivatives designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions.
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge and is determined to be highly effective, changes in its fair value are recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows being hedged (e.g., when periodic settlements on a variable-rate asset or liability are recorded in earnings). At that time, the related portion of deferred gains or losses on the derivative instrument is reclassified and reported in the income statement line item associated with the hedged item.
If it is determined that a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge, or management removes the hedge designation, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The asset or liability under a fair value hedge will no longer be adjusted for changes in fair value and the existing basis adjustment is amortized to the income statement line associated with the asset or liability. The component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” related to discontinued cash flow hedges is amortized to the income statement line associated with the hedged cash flows consistent with the earnings impact of the original hedged cash flows.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the specified time period, the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet at its fair value, with changes in fair value recognized currently in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” Gains and losses that were in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” pursuant to the hedge of a forecasted transaction are recognized immediately in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
If a derivative does not qualify for hedge accounting, all changes in its fair value, including net receipts and payments, are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net” without considering changes in the fair value of the economically associated assets or liabilities.
The Company is a party to financial instruments that contain derivative instruments that are “embedded” in the financial instruments. At inception, the Company assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the financial instrument (i.e., the host contract) and whether a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that (1) the embedded derivative possesses economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and (2) a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and changes in its fair value are included in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” For certain financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative that otherwise would need to be bifurcated and reported at fair value, the Company may elect to classify the entire instrument as a trading account asset and report it within “Trading account assets, at fair value.”
The Company sells variable annuity contracts that include optional living benefit features that may be treated from an accounting perspective as embedded derivatives. The Company has reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain of these embedded derivatives to an affiliate, Pruco Reinsurance Ltd. (“Pruco Re”). The embedded derivatives related to the living benefit features and the related reinsurance agreements are carried at fair value and included in “Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities” and “Reinsurance recoverables,” respectively. Changes in the fair value are determined using valuation models as described in Note 3, and are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
The Company, excluding its subsidiaries, also sells certain universal life products that contain a no lapse guarantee provision that is reinsured with an affiliate, Universal Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Company (“UPARC”). The reinsurance of this no lapse guarantee results in an embedded derivative that incurs market risk primarily in the form of interest rate risk. Interest rate sensitivity can result in changes in the value of the underlying contractual guarantees that are carried at fair value and included in “Reinsurance recoverable,” and changes in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” In the third quarter of 2011, the Company amended its reinsurance agreement resulting in a recapture of a portion of this business (See Note 8 to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements) effective July 1, 2011. Pursuant to the recapture amendment, the settlement
12
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
of the recaptured premium occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date. As a result, the recaptured premium was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between this date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through the settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from an asset portfolio within UPARC. This settlement feature is accounted for as an embedded derivative.
Concurrent with the recapture discussed above, the Company entered into a new coinsurance agreement with an affiliate, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company, (“PAR U”) effective July 1, 2011. The settlement of the initial coinsurance premium also occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date and contains a settlement provision similar to the recapture premium, discussed above. The adjustment to the initial coinsurance premium was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through the settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from both an asset portfolio within the Company, as well as an asset portfolio within UPARC. The settlement feature of this agreement is accounted for as an embedded derivative (See Note 8 to the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for additional information about this agreement.).
Income Taxes
The Company determines its interim tax provision using the annual effective tax rate methodology as required by ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). As a result of the volatility in the US markets and its impact on the Company’s ability to forecast pre-tax earnings, the increase in the income tax benefit and change in effective tax rate was primarily driven by a change from pre-tax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to a pre-tax loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued updated guidance clarifying which restructurings constitute troubled debt restructurings. It is intended to assist creditors in their evaluation of whether conditions exist that constitute a troubled debt restructuring. This new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual reporting period of adoption. The Company’s adoption of this guidance in the third quarter of 2011 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or financial statement disclosures.
In July 2010, the FASB issued updated guidance that requires enhanced disclosures related to the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of a company’s financing receivable portfolio. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance effective December 31, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The required disclosures are included above and in Note 3. In January 2011, the FASB deferred the disclosures required by this guidance related to troubled debt restructurings. These disclosures are effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, concurrent with the effective date of guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The disclosures required by this guidance related to troubled debt restructurings were adopted in the third quarter of 2011 and are included above and in Note 3.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance clarifying that an insurance entity should not consider any separate account interests in an investment held for the benefit of policyholders to be the insurer’s interests, and should not combine those interests with its general account interest in the same investment when assessing the investment for consolidation, unless the separate account interests are held for a related party policyholder, whereby consolidation of such interests must be considered under applicable variable interest guidance. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 and retrospectively to all prior periods upon the date of adoption, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2011 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and financial statement disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued updated guidance that requires new fair value disclosures about significant transfers between Level 1 and 2 measurement categories and separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the roll forward of Level 3 activity. Also, this updated fair value guidance clarifies the disclosure requirements about level of disaggregation and valuation techniques and inputs. This new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of Level 3 activity, which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted the guidance effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 on January 1, 2010. The Company adopted the guidance effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010 on January 1, 2011. The required disclosures are provided in Note 4 and Note 5.
Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. The updated guidance eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. Under the updated guidance, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The updated guidance does not change the items that are reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. In October 2011, the FASB proposed a deferral of the requirement to separately present reclassifications from the components of other comprehensive income to the components of net income on the face of the financial statements. If the deferral is effective, companies would still be required to adopt the other requirements of the updated guidance. This updated guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively. The Company expects this guidance to impact its financial statement presentation but not to impact the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
13
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
In May 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the fair value measurements and disclosure requirements. The updated guidance clarifies existing guidance related to the application of fair value measurement methods and requires expanded disclosures. This new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively. The Company expects this guidance to have an impact on its financial statement disclosures but limited, if any, impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued updated guidance regarding the assessment of effective control for repurchase agreements. This new guidance is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and financial statement disclosures.
In October 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to address diversity in practice regarding the interpretation of which costs relating to the acquisition of new or renewal insurance contracts qualify for deferral. Under the amended guidance acquisition costs are to include only those costs that are directly related to the acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts by applying a model similar to the accounting for loan origination costs. An entity may defer incremental direct costs of contract acquisition with independent third parties or employees that are essential to the contract transaction, as well as the portion of employee compensation, including payroll fringe benefits, and other costs directly related to underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical inspection, and contract selling for successfully negotiated contracts. This amended guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 and permits, but does not require, retrospective application. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2012, and expects to apply the retrospective method of adoption. Accordingly, upon adoption, “Deferred policy acquisition costs” will be reduced with a corresponding reduction, net of taxes, to “Retained earnings” (and “Total equity”), as a result of acquisition costs previously deferred that are not eligible for deferral under the amended guidance. The Company estimates if the amended guidance were adopted as of September 30, 2011, retrospective adoption would reduce “Deferred policy acquisition costs” by approximately $500 million to $850 million, and reduce “Total equity” by approximately $330 million to $550 million. The estimated impact of adoption at September 30, 2011 is based upon the “Deferred policy acquisition cost” balance at that date: the actual impact at adoption will vary based upon the “Deferred policy acquisition cost” balance at January 1, 2012. Subsequent to the adoption of the guidance, the lower level of costs qualifying for deferral may be only partially offset by a lower level of amortization of “Deferred policy acquisition costs” and, as such, may initially result in lower earnings in future periods which will impact lower deferrals of wholesaler costs associated with annual sales. While the adoption of this amended guidance changes the timing of when certain costs are reflected in the Company’s results of operations It has no effect on the total acquisition costs to be recognized over time and will have no impact on the Company’s cash flows.
3. INVESTMENTS
Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities
The following tables provide information relating to fixed maturities and equity securities (excluding investments classified as trading) as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other-than- | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross | Gross | temporary | ||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | impairments | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | in AOCI (4) | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | 106,506 | $ | 12,603 | $ | 2 | $ | 119,107 | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
36,671 | 6,367 | — | 43,038 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
47,955 | 6,597 | 4 | 54,548 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Public utilities |
626,758 | 64,824 | 2,385 | 689,197 | — | |||||||||||||||
| All other corporate securities |
3,569,017 | 315,041 | 9,128 | 3,874,930 | (1,038 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (1) |
378,364 | 21,727 | 22,573 | 377,518 | (28,120 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
548,306 | 37,042 | 114 | 585,234 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities (2) |
313,584 | 26,655 | 241 | 339,998 | (1,330 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total fixed maturities, available for sale |
$ | 5,627,161 | $ | 490,856 | $ | 34,447 | $ | 6,083,570 | $ | (30,488 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stocks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Public utilities |
90 | 4 | 18 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||
| Industrial, miscellaneous & other |
7,442 | 534 | 2,400 | 5,576 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-redeemable preferred stocks |
2,437 | 28 | — | 2,465 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total equity securities, available for sale (3) |
$ | 9,969 | $ | 566 | $ | 2,418 | $ | 8,117 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
14
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| (1) | Includes credit tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types. |
| (2) | Includes publicly traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. |
| (3) | As of September 30, 2011, perpetual preferred stocks of $8.4 million were reclassified to Other Trading Account Assets. Prior periods were not restated. |
| (4) | Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI,” which were not included in earnings. Amount excludes $12 million of net unrealized gains (losses) on impaired securities relating to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date. |
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized Gains |
Gross Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Other-than- temporary impairments in AOCI (3) |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | 223,442 | $ | 4,563 | $ | 43 | $ | 227,962 | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
25,126 | 66 | 1,063 | 24,129 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
48,725 | 5,984 | — | 54,709 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Public utilities |
494,163 | 40,646 | 2,412 | 532,397 | — | |||||||||||||||
| All other corporate securities |
3,596,805 | 252,050 | 11,055 | 3,837,800 | (694 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities (1) |
417,339 | 22,316 | 30,077 | 409,578 | (37,817 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
546,056 | 34,711 | 247 | 580,520 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities (2) |
350,173 | 25,228 | 193 | 375,208 | (1,437 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total fixed maturities, available for sale |
$ | 5,701,829 | $ | 385,564 | $ | 45,090 | $ | 6,042,303 | $ | (39,948 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Equity securities available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Common Stocks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Public utilities |
90 | 13 | — | 103 | ||||||||||||||||
| Industrial, miscellaneous & other |
7,324 | 2,545 | 308 | 9,561 | ||||||||||||||||
| Non-redeemable preferred stocks |
2,439 | — | 1,391 | 1,048 | ||||||||||||||||
| Perpetual preferred stocks |
8,111 | 794 | 210 | 8,695 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total equity securities, available for sale |
$ | 17,964 | $ | 3,352 | $ | 1,909 | $ | 19,407 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes credit tranched securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages, auto loans, credit cards, education loans, and other asset types. |
| (2) | Includes publicly traded agency pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. |
| (3) | Represents the amount of other-than-temporary impairments losses in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI” which were not included in earnings. Amount excludes $15 million of net unrealized gains (losses) on impaired securities relating to changes in the fair value of such securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date. |
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturities by contractual maturities at September 30, 2011, are as follows:
| Available for Sale | ||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Due in one year or less |
$ | 436,317 | $ | 444,075 | ||||
| Due after one year through five years |
1,746,948 | 1,877,709 | ||||||
| Due after five years through ten years |
1,529,416 | 1,692,459 | ||||||
| Due after ten years |
674,226 | 766,577 | ||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
378,364 | 377,518 | ||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
548,306 | 585,234 | ||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities |
313,584 | 339,998 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total |
$ | 5,627,161 | $ | 6,083,570 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Asset-backed, commercial mortgage-backed, and residential mortgage-backed securities are shown separately in the table above, as they are not due at a single maturity date.
The following table depicts the sources of fixed maturity proceeds, equity securities proceeds, and related investment gains (losses), as well as losses on impairments of both fixed maturities and equity securities:
15
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sales |
$ | 8,544 | $ | 102,673 | $ | 93,003 | $ | 636,559 | ||||||||
| Proceeds from maturities/repayments |
251,043 | 189,233 | 631,656 | 652,547 | ||||||||||||
| Gross investment gains from sales, prepayments and maturities |
3,135 | 5,876 | 8,836 | 33,559 | ||||||||||||
| Gross investment losses from sales and maturities |
— | (96 | ) | (366 | ) | (1,956 | ) | |||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sales |
$ | 6,205 | $ | — | $ | 10,349 | $ | 13,977 | ||||||||
| Gross investment gains from sales |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Gross investment losses from sales |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Fixed maturity and equity security impairments |
||||||||||||||||
| Net writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on fixed maturities recognized in earnings (1) |
$ | (2,093 | ) | $ | (3,161 | ) | $ | (6,092 | ) | $ | (8,520 | ) | ||||
| Writedowns for other-than-temporary impairment losses on equity securities |
(476 | ) | (57 | ) | (1,833 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||||||
| (1) | Excludes the portion of other-than-temporary impairments recorded in “Other comprehensive income (loss),” representing any difference between the fair value of the impaired debt security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows at the time of impairment. |
As discussed in Note 2, a portion of certain other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) losses on fixed maturity securities are recognized in “Other comprehensive income (loss)” (“OCI”). The net amount recognized in earnings (“credit loss impairments”) represents the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the net present value of its projected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate implicit in the debt security prior to impairment. Any remaining difference between the fair value and amortized cost is recognized in OCI. The following tables set forth the amount of pre-tax credit loss impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company as of the dates indicated, for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI, and the corresponding changes in such amounts.
Credit losses recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||
| 2011 | 2011 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 29,546 | $ | 36,820 | ||||
| Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities which matured, paid down, prepaid or were sold during the period |
(1,480 | ) | (7,054 | ) | ||||
| Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period (1) |
— | (4,055 | ) | |||||
| Credit loss impairment recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired |
— | 85 | ||||||
| Additional credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities previously impaired |
1,487 | 3,981 | ||||||
| Increases due to the passage of time on previously recorded credit losses |
452 | 1,145 | ||||||
| Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected |
(199 | ) | (1,116 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Balance, end of period |
$ | 29,806 | $ | 29,806 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||
| 2010 | 2010 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 42,859 | $ | 42,944 | ||||
| Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities which matured, paid down, prepaid or were sold during the period |
(749 | ) | (5,767 | ) | ||||
| Credit loss impairments previously recognized on securities impaired to fair value during the period (1) |
(2,173 | ) | (2,173 | ) | ||||
| Credit loss impairment recognized in the current period on securities not previously impaired |
— | 2 | ||||||
| Additional credit loss impairments recognized in the current period on securities previously impaired |
2,135 | 7,099 | ||||||
| Increases due to the passage of time on previously recorded credit losses |
317 | 1,926 | ||||||
| Accretion of credit loss impairments previously recognized due to an increase in cash flows expected to be collected |
(596 | ) | (2,238 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Balance, end of period |
$ | 41,793 | $ | 41,793 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
16
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| (1) | Represents circumstances where the Company determined in the current period that it intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of the security’s amortized cost. |
Trading Account Assets
The following table provides information relating to trading account assets as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
$ | 16,463 | $ | 17,469 | $ | 16,074 | $ | 17,525 | ||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
4,971 | 5,089 | 4,950 | 5,180 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total fixed maturities |
21,434 | 22,558 | 21,024 | 22,705 | ||||||||||||
| Equity securities (1) |
8,111 | 8,394 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total trading account assets |
$ | 29,545 | $ | 30,952 | $ | 21,024 | $ | 22,705 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | As of September 30, 2011, perpetual preferred stocks of $8.4 million were reclassified from Equity Securities. Prior periods were not restated. |
The net change in unrealized gains (losses) from trading account assets still held at period end, recorded within “Other income” was $0.0 million and ($0.1) million during the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and ($0.3) million and $0.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Commercial Mortgage and Other Loans
The Company’s commercial mortgage and other loans are comprised as follows as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Amount (in thousands) |
% of Total |
Amount (in thousands) |
% of Total |
|||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans by property type: |
||||||||||||||||
| Industrial buildings |
$ | 227,823 | 16.4 | % | $ | 226,174 | 17.4 | % | ||||||||
| Retail |
469,835 | 33.8 | 438,072 | 33.8 | ||||||||||||
| Apartments/Multi-Family |
228,857 | 16.5 | 203,749 | 15.7 | ||||||||||||
| Office buildings |
218,983 | 15.8 | 208,699 | 16.1 | ||||||||||||
| Hospitality |
62,909 | 4.5 | 57,409 | 4.4 | ||||||||||||
| Other |
86,388 | 6.2 | 85,133 | 6.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans by property type |
1,294,795 | 93.2 | 1,219,236 | 94.0 | ||||||||||||
| Agricultural property loans |
93,984 | 6.8 | 77,214 | 6.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total commercial mortgage and agricultural loans |
1,388,779 | 100.0 | % | 1,296,450 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Valuation allowance |
(16,164 | ) | (21,428 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total net commercial and agricultural mortgage loans by property type |
$ | 1,372,615 | $ | 1,275,022 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
The commercial mortgage and agricultural loans are geographically dispersed throughout the United States with the largest concentrations in California (22%), New Jersey (11%) and Virginia (8%) at September 30, 2011.
Activity in the allowance for losses for all commercial mortgage and other loans, as of the dates indicated, is as follows:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
Agricultural Property Loans |
Total | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for losses, beginning of year |
$ | 21,007 | $ | 421 | $ | 21,428 | ||||||
| Addition to / (release of) allowance of losses |
(5,328 | ) | 64 | (5,264 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance |
$ | 15,679 | $ | 485 | $ | 16,164 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
17
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
Agricultural Property Loans |
Total | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for losses, beginning of year |
$ | 25,742 | $ | — | $ | 25,742 | ||||||
| Addition to / (release of) allowance of losses |
(4,735 | ) | 421 | (4,314 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance |
$ | 21,007 | $ | 421 | $ | 21,428 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
The following tables set forth the allowance for credit losses and the recorded investment in commercial mortgage and other loans as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
Agricultural Property Loans |
Total | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for Credit Losses: |
||||||||||||
| Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 6,378 | $ | — | $ | 6,378 | ||||||
| Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment |
9,301 | 485 | 9,786 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance |
$ | 15,679 | $ | 485 | $ | 16,164 | ||||||
| Recorded Investment: (1) |
||||||||||||
| Ending balance gross of reserves: individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 21,807 | $ | — | $ | 21,807 | ||||||
| Ending balance gross of reserves: collectively evaluated for impairment |
1,272,988 | 93,984 | 1,366,972 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance, gross of reserves |
$ | 1,294,795 | $ | 93,984 | $ | 1,388,779 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| (1) | Recorded investment reflects the balance sheet carrying value gross of related allowance. |
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial Mortgage Loans |
Agricultural Property Loans |
Total | ||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for Credit Losses: |
||||||||||||
| Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 10,536 | $ | — | $ | 10,536 | ||||||
| Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment |
10,471 | 421 | 10,892 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance |
$ | 21,007 | $ | 421 | $ | 21,428 | ||||||
| Recorded Investment: (1) |
||||||||||||
| Ending balance gross of reserves: individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 38,061 | $ | — | $ | 38,061 | ||||||
| Ending balance gross of reserves: collectively evaluated for impairment |
1,181,175 | 77,214 | 1,258,389 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total ending balance, gross of reserves |
$ | 1,219,236 | $ | 77,214 | $ | 1,296,450 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| (1) | Recorded investment reflects the balance sheet carrying value gross of related allowance. |
Impaired loans include those loans for which it is probable that amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not all be collected. Impaired commercial mortgage and other loans identified in management’s specific review of probable loan losses and the related allowance for losses, as of the dates indicated are as follows:
Impaired Commercial Mortgage Loans
18
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Recorded Investment (1) |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Related Allowance |
Average Recorded Investment Before Allowance (3) |
Interest Income Recognized (2) |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Industrial |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Retail |
— | — | — | 9,360 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Apartments/Multi-family |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Office |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Hospitality |
15,386 | 15,386 | 5,969 | 15,611 | 127 | |||||||||||||||
| Other |
6,421 | 6,415 | 409 | 8,002 | 272 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans |
$ | 21,807 | $ | 21,801 | $ | 6,378 | $ | 32,973 | $ | 399 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| (1) | Recorded investment reflects the balance sheet carrying value gross of related allowance. |
| (2) | The interest income recognized reflects the related year-to-date income, regardless of the impairment timing. |
| (3) | Average recorded investment represents the average of the beginning-of-period and all subsequent quarterly end-of-period balances. |
| As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
| Recorded Investment (1) |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Related Allowance |
||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||
| Industrial |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
| Retail |
12,555 | 12,555 | 2,079 | |||||||||
| Apartments/Multi-family |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| Office |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| Hospitality |
15,844 | 15,844 | 7,816 | |||||||||
| Other |
9,662 | 9,662 | 641 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans |
$ | 38,061 | $ | 38,061 | $ | 10,536 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| (1) | Recorded investment reflects the balance sheet carrying value gross of related allowance. |
At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company held no impaired agricultural loans.
Impaired commercial mortgage and other loans with no allowance for losses are loans in which the fair value of the collateral or the net present value of the loans’ expected future cash flows equals or exceeds the recorded investment. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company held no impaired commercial mortgage and other loans with no allowances for losses. The average recorded investment in impaired loans before allowance for losses was $38 million at December 31, 2010. Net investment income recognized on these loans totaled $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. See Note 2 for information regarding the Company’s accounting policies for non-performing loans.
The following tables set forth the credit quality indicators as of September 30, 2011, based upon the recorded investment gross of allowance for credit losses.
Commercial mortgage and agricultural loans
19
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Debt Service Coverage Ratio - September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than 2.0X |
1.8X to 2.0X |
1.5X to <1.8X |
1.2X to <1.5X |
1.0X to <1.2X |
Less than 1.0X |
Grand Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan-to-Value Ratio |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0%-49.99% |
$ | 214,342 | $ | 10,824 | $ | 90,368 | $ | 91,354 | $ | 28,206 | $ | 3,424 | $ | 438,518 | ||||||||||||||
| 50%-59.99% |
123,865 | 48,680 | 16,229 | 13,521 | 5,116 | 2,240 | 209,651 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 60%-69.99% |
64,141 | 73,248 | 57,864 | 113,824 | 51,644 | 25,928 | 386,649 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 70%-79.99% |
17,747 | 19,975 | 13,348 | 95,178 | 36,990 | 66,368 | 249,606 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 80%-89.99% |
— | — | — | 48,829 | 14,394 | 17,702 | 80,925 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 90%-100% |
— | — | — | 8,044 | — | — | 8,044 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than 100% |
— | 3,816 | — | — | — | 11,570 | 15,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total Commercial Mortgage and Agricultural Loans (1) |
$ | 420,095 | $ | 156,543 | $ | 177,809 | $ | 370,750 | $ | 136,350 | $ | 127,232 | $ | 1,388,779 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| (1) | Agricultural loans had a recorded investment of $94.0 million at September 30, 2011, none of which had a loan-to-value ratio greater than 100% or debt service payments less than 1.0 times the property’s net operating income. |
The following tables set forth the credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2010, based upon the recorded investment gross of allowance for credit losses.
Commercial mortgage and agricultural loans
| Debt Service Coverage Ratio - December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than 2.0X |
1.8X to 2.0X |
1.5X to <1.8X |
1.2X to <1.5X |
1.0X to <1.2X |
Less than 1.0X |
Grand Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan-to-Value Ratio |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0%-49.99% |
$ | 126,721 | $ | 67,255 | $ | 114,322 | $ | 44,807 | $ | 18,688 | $ | 4,211 | $ | 376,004 | ||||||||||||||
| 50%-59.99% |
48,665 | 24,168 | 34,349 | — | 8,900 | — | 116,082 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 60%-69.99% |
107,103 | 92,211 | 34,119 | 104,588 | 32,743 | — | 370,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 70%-79.99% |
5,000 | 14,462 | 21,558 | 132,812 | 95,433 | 2,365 | 271,630 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 80%-89.99% |
— | — | — | 62,323 | 8,909 | 17,972 | 89,204 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 90%-100% |
— | — | — | — | 11,216 | 21,846 | 33,062 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Greater than 100% |
— | — | — | 3,847 | 14,198 | 21,659 | 39,704 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total Commercial Mortgage and Agricultural Loans (1) |
$ | 287,489 | $ | 198,096 | $ | 204,348 | $ | 348,377 | $ | 190,087 | $ | 68,053 | $ | 1,296,450 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| (1) | Agricultural loans had a recorded investment of $77.2 million at December 31, 2010, none of which had a loan-to-value ratio greater than 100% or debt service payments less than 1.0 times the property’s net operating income. |
The following tables provide an aging of past due commercial mortgage and other loans as of the dates indicated, based upon the recorded investment gross of allowance for credit losses.
| As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current | 30-59 Days Past Due |
60-89 Days Past Due |
Greater Than 90 Day - Accruing |
Greater Than 90 Day - Not Accruing |
Total Past Due |
Total Commercial Mortgage and other Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Industrial |
$ | 227,823 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 227,823 | ||||||||||||||
| Retail |
469,835 | — | — | — | — | — | 469,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Apartments/Multi-Family |
228,857 | — | — | — | — | — | 228,857 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Office |
218,983 | — | — | — | — | — | 218,983 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Hospitality |
59,094 | — | — | — | 3,815 | 3,815 | 62,909 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other |
84,766 | — | — | — | 1,622 | 1,622 | 86,388 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans |
1,289,358 | — | — | — | 5,437 | 5,437 | 1,294,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Agricultural property loans |
93,984 | — | — | — | — | — | 93,984 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 1,383,342 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,437 | $ | 5,437 | $ | 1,388,779 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current | 30-59 Days Past Due |
60-89 Days Past Due |
Greater Than 90 Day - Accruing |
Greater Than 90 Day - Not Accruing |
Total Past Due |
Total Commercial Mortgage and other Loans |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Industrial |
$ | 226,174 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 226,174 | ||||||||||||||
| Retail |
425,517 | 12,555 | — | — | — | 12,555 | 438,072 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Apartments/Multi-Family |
203,749 | — | — | — | — | — | 203,749 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Office |
208,699 | — | — | — | — | — | 208,699 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Hospitality |
57,409 | — | — | — | — | — | 57,409 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Other |
75,471 | — | — | — | 9,662 | 9,662 | 85,133 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans |
$ | 1,197,019 | $ | 12,555 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,662 | $ | 22,217 | $ | 1,219,236 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Agricultural property loans |
77,214 | — | — | — | — | — | 77,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 1,274,233 | $ | 12,555 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9,662 | $ | 22,217 | $ | 1,296,450 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
See Note 2 for further discussion regarding nonaccrual status loans. The following table sets forth commercial mortgage and other loans on nonaccrual status as of the dates indicated, based upon the recorded investment gross of allowance for credit losses:
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Commercial mortgage loans: |
||||||||
| Industrial |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
| Retail |
9,747 | 12,555 | ||||||
| Apartments/Multi-Family |
— | — | ||||||
| Office |
— | — | ||||||
| Hospitality |
15,386 | 15,844 | ||||||
| Other |
8,044 | 9,662 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total commercial mortgage loans |
$ | 33,177 | $ | 38,061 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
For the three months ended September 30, 2011, there were no commercial mortgage and other loans sold or acquired.
The Company’s commercial mortgage and other loans involved in a trouble debt restructuring consisted of retail and other loans. The pre-modification outstanding recorded investment has been adjusted for any partial payoffs and is recorded as carrying value, gross of reserves of $22 million as of September 30, 2011. The post-modification outstanding recorded investment is recorded at carrying value, gross of reserves and had a balance of $16 million as of September 30, 2011. During the nine months of 2011, the Company did not receive any default payments during the current period, does not have a reserve established for the above mentioned commercial mortgage loans or has recognized any gain/loss on reserves. See Note 2 for additional information relating to the accounting for troubled debt restructurings. The Company had no payment defaults during the period on commercial mortgage and other loans that were modified as a troubled debt restructuring within the last 12 months.
Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was from the following sources:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
$ | 75,920 | $ | 77,771 | $ | 230,005 | $ | 234,794 | ||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
12 | 169 | 465 | 873 | ||||||||||||
| Trading account assets |
405 | 297 | 949 | 867 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
20,671 | 18,546 | 60,627 | 52,321 | ||||||||||||
| Policy loans |
14,005 | 14,047 | 41,942 | 41,283 | ||||||||||||
| Short-term investments and cash equivalents |
261 | 258 | 848 | 510 | ||||||||||||
| Other long-term investments |
746 | 3,645 | 6,784 | 8,159 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Gross investment income |
112,021 | 114,733 | 341,620 | 338,807 | ||||||||||||
| Less: investment expenses |
(4,566 | ) | (4,242 | ) | (13,687 | ) | (12,139 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Net investment income |
$ | 107,455 | $ | 110,491 | $ | 327,933 | $ | 326,668 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Realized Investment Gains (Losses), Net
Realized investment gains (losses), net, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were from the following sources:
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities |
$ | 1,043 | $ | 2,619 | $ | 2,378 | $ | 23,082 | ||||||||
| Equity securities |
96 | 152 | 2,020 | (305 | ) | |||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
2,937 | 951 | 5,264 | 1,815 | ||||||||||||
| Joint ventures and limited partnerships |
(265 | ) | — | (265 | ) | — | ||||||||||
| Derivatives |
202,147 | 13,722 | 224,302 | 41,466 | ||||||||||||
| Other |
13 | — | 20 | 43 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | 205,971 | $ | 17,444 | $ | 233,719 | $ | 66,101 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)
Net unrealized investment gains and losses on securities classified as “available for sale” and certain other long-term investments and other assets are included in the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),” or “AOCI.” Changes in these amounts include reclassification adjustments to exclude from “Other comprehensive income (loss)” those items that are included as part of “Net income” for a period that had been part of “Other comprehensive income (loss)” in earlier periods. The amounts for the periods indicated below, split between amounts related to fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized, and all other net unrealized investment gains and losses, are as follows:
Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses on Fixed Maturity Securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized
| Net Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Investments |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Costs |
Policy Holder Account Balances |
Deferred Income Tax (Liability) Benefit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Related To Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | (24,704 | ) | $ | 16,255 | $ | (7,129 | ) | $ | 5,452 | $ | (10,126 | ) | |||||||
| Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period |
(2,012 | ) | — | — | 704 | (1,308 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses included in net income |
8,067 | — | — | (2,823 | ) | 5,244 | ||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for OTTI gains excluded from net income(1) |
379 | — | — | (133 | ) | 246 | ||||||||||||||
| Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs |
— | (6,731 | ) | — | 2,356 | (4,375 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on Policyholders’ account balance |
— | — | 5,644 | (1,975 | ) | 3,669 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Balance, September 30, 2011 |
$ | (18,270 | ) | $ | 9,524 | $ | (1,485 | ) | $ | 3,581 | $ | (6,650 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| (1) | Represents “transfers in” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss. |
22
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
All Other Net Unrealized Investment Gains and Losses in AOCI
| Net Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments(1) |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Other Costs |
Policy Holder Account Balances |
Deferred Income Tax (Liability) Benefit |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Related To Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 400,404 | $ | (230,749 | ) | $ | 93,029 | $ | (91,858 | ) | $ | 170,826 | ||||||||
| Net investment gains (losses) on investments arising during the period |
94,751 | — | — | (33,163 | ) | 61,588 | ||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income |
12,464 | — | — | (4,362 | ) | 8,102 | ||||||||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for OTTI losses excluded from net income(2) |
(379 | ) | — | — | 133 | (246 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on deferred policy acquisition costs |
— | 22,516 | — | (7,881 | ) | 14,635 | ||||||||||||||
| Impact of net unrealized investment (gains) losses on policyholders’ account balances |
— | — | (40,853 | ) | 14,298 | (26,555 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Balance, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 507,240 | $ | (208,233 | ) | $ | 52,176 | $ | (122,833 | ) | $ | 228,350 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| (1) | Includes cash flow hedges. See Note 5 for information on cash flow hedges. |
| (2) | Represents “transfers out” related to the portion of OTTI losses recognized during the period that were not recognized in earnings for securities with no prior OTTI loss. |
23
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The table below presents net unrealized gains (losses) on investments by asset class as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Fixed maturity securities on which an OTTI loss has been recognized |
$ | (18,270 | ) | $ | (24,704 | ) | ||
| Fixed maturity securities, available for sale - all other |
474,679 | 365,178 | ||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
(1,853 | ) | 1,443 | |||||
| Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges (1) |
2,013 | 808 | ||||||
| Other investments |
32,401 | 32,975 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments |
$ | 488,970 | $ | 375,700 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| (1) | See Note 5 for more information on cash flow hedges. |
Duration of Gross Unrealized Loss Positions for Fixed Maturities
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual fixed maturity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the dates indicated:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than twelve months | Twelve months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | 4,698 | $ | 2 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,698 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
96 | 4 | — | — | 96 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate securities |
225,659 | 8,150 | 23,554 | 3,363 | 249,213 | 11,513 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
34,388 | 359 | 72,379 | 22,214 | 106,767 | 22,573 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
29,001 | 114 | — | — | 29,001 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities |
5,149 | 125 | 4,191 | 116 | 9,340 | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 298,991 | $ | 8,754 | $ | 100,124 | $ | 25,693 | $ | 399,115 | $ | 34,447 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than twelve months | Twelve months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | 9,075 | 43 | — | — | $ | 9,075 | $ | 43 | |||||||||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
20,662 | 1,063 | — | — | 20,662 | 1,063 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
152 | — | — | — | 152 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate securities |
330,322 | 9,606 | 51,283 | 3,860 | 381,605 | 13,466 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
23,625 | 189 | 95,622 | 29,888 | 119,247 | 30,077 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
14,375 | 247 | — | — | 14,375 | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities |
3,406 | 57 | 5,934 | 137 | 9,340 | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 401,617 | $ | 11,205 | $ | 152,839 | $ | 33,885 | $ | 554,456 | $ | 45,090 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
The gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are composed of $9 million and $23 million, respectively, related to high or highest quality securities based on NAIC or equivalent rating and $25 million and $22 million, respectively, related to other than high or highest quality securities based on NAIC or equivalent rating. At September 30, 2011, $22 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines in value of greater than 20%, $7 million of which had been in that position for less than six months, as compared to $27 million at December 31, 2010
24
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
that represented declines in value of greater than 20%, none of which had been in that position for less than six months. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the $26 million and $34 million respectively, of gross unrealized losses of twelve months or more were concentrated in asset backed securities. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment to earnings for other-than-temporary impairments for these securities was not warranted at September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. These conclusions are based on a detailed analysis of the underlying credit and cash flows on each security. The gross unrealized losses are primarily attributable to credit spread widening and increased liquidity discounts. At September 30, 2011, the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis.
Duration of Gross Unrealized Loss Positions for Equity Securities
The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses aggregated by length of time that individual equity securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, as of the following dates:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than twelve months |
Twelve months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
$ | 2,065 | $ | 2,162 | $ | 521 | $ | 256 | $ | 2,586 | $ | 2,418 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less than twelve months |
Twelve months or more | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
Fair Value |
Unrealized Losses |
|||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
$ | 6,606 | $ | 1,750 | $ | 1,536 | $ | 159 | $ | 8,142 | $ | 1,909 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
At September 30, 2011, $2.4 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines of greater than 20%, $2.2 million of which have been in that position for less than six months. At December 31, 2010, $2 million of the gross unrealized losses represented declines of greater than 20%, all of which had been in that position for less than six months. Included in the December 31, 2010 table above are perpetual preferred securities. Perpetual preferred securities have characteristics of both debt and equity securities. Since an impairment model similar to fixed maturity securities is applied to these securities, an other-than-temporary impairment has not been recognized on certain perpetual preferred securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. In accordance with its policy described in Note 2, the Company concluded that an adjustment for other-than-temporary impairments for these equity securities was not warranted at September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
| 4. | FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
Fair Value Measurement – Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative guidance around fair value established a framework for measuring fair value that includes a hierarchy used to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques into three levels. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 - Fair value is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible to the Company for identical assets or liabilities. These generally provide the most reliable evidence and are used to measure fair value whenever available. Active markets are defined as having the following characteristics for the measured asset/liability: (i) many transactions, (ii) current prices, (iii) price quotes not varying substantially among market makers, (iv) narrow bid/ask spreads and (v) most information publicly available. The Company’s Level 1 assets and liabilities primarily include certain cash equivalents and certain short term investments, equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market. Prices are obtained from readily available sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 - Fair value is based on significant inputs, other than Level 1 inputs, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability through corroboration with observable market data. Level 2 inputs include quoted market prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted market prices in markets that are not active for identical or similar assets or liabilities, and other market observable inputs. The Company’s Level 2 assets and liabilities include: fixed maturities (corporate public and private bonds, most
25
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
government securities, certain asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities, etc.), certain equity securities (mutual funds, which do not actively trade and are priced based on a net asset value), and commercial mortgage loans, certain short-term investments and certain cash equivalents (primarily commercial paper), and certain over-the-counter derivatives. Valuations are generally obtained from third party pricing services for identical or comparable assets or liabilities or through the use of valuation methodologies using observable market inputs. Prices from services are validated through comparison to trade data and internal estimates of current fair value, generally developed using market observable inputs and economic indicators.
Level 3 - Fair value is based on at least one or more significant unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities primarily include: certain private fixed maturities and equity securities, certain manually priced public equity securities and fixed maturities, certain highly structured over-the-counter derivative contracts, certain commercial mortgage loans, certain consolidated real estate funds for which the Company is the general partner, and embedded derivatives resulting from certain products with guaranteed benefits. Prices are determined using valuation methodologies such as option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and other similar techniques. Non-binding broker quotes, which are utilized when pricing service information is not available, are reviewed for reasonableness based on the Company’s understanding of the market, and are generally considered Level 3. Under certain conditions, based on its observations of transactions in active markets, the Company may conclude the prices received from independent third party pricing services or brokers are not reasonable or reflective of market activity. In those instances, the Company may choose to over-ride the third-party pricing information or quotes received and apply internally- developed values to the related assets or liabilities. To the extent the internally-developed valuations use significant unobservable inputs, they are classified as Level 3. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, these over-rides on a net basis were not material.
Assets and Liabilities by Hierarchy Level - The tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the dates indicated.
| As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | — | $ | 114,409 | $ | 4,698 | $ | 119,107 | ||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
— | 43,038 | — | 43,038 | ||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
— | 54,548 | — | 54,548 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate securities |
— | 4,531,142 | 32,985 | 4,564,127 | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
— | 325,085 | 52,433 | 377,518 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
— | 585,234 | — | 585,234 | ||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities |
— | 339,998 | — | 339,998 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total |
— | 5,993,454 | 90,116 | 6,083,570 | ||||||||||||
| Trading account assets: |
||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
— | 17,469 | — | 17,469 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
— | 5,089 | — | 5,089 | ||||||||||||
| Equity securities |
— | — | 8,394 | 8,394 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total |
— | 22,558 | 8,394 | 30,952 | ||||||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
5,099 | — | 3,018 | 8,117 | ||||||||||||
| Short-term investments |
119,276 | 276,828 | — | 396,104 | ||||||||||||
| Cash equivalents |
4,966 | 112,681 | — | 117,647 | ||||||||||||
| Other long-term investments |
— | 103,867 | 659 | 104,526 | ||||||||||||
| Other assets |
— | 72,931 | 1,009,943 | 1,082,874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total excluding separate account assets |
129,341 | 6,582,319 | 1,112,130 | 7,823,790 | ||||||||||||
| Separate account assets (1) |
1,437,977 | 50,470,679 | 220,491 | 52,129,147 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 1,567,318 | $ | 57,052,998 | $ | 1,332,621 | $ | 59,952,937 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Future policy benefits |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 964,308 | $ | 964,308 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total liabilities |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 964,308 | $ | 964,308 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
26
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fixed maturities, available for sale: |
||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government authorities and agencies |
$ | — | $ | 227,962 | $ | — | $ | 227,962 | ||||||||
| Obligations of U.S. states and their political subdivisions |
— | 24,129 | — | 24,129 | ||||||||||||
| Foreign government bonds |
— | 54,709 | — | 54,709 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate securities |
— | 4,321,147 | 49,050 | 4,370,197 | ||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
— | 349,808 | 59,770 | 409,578 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
— | 580,520 | — | 580,520 | ||||||||||||
| Residential mortgage-backed securities |
— | 375,208 | — | 375,208 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total |
— | 5,933,483 | 108,820 | 6,042,303 | ||||||||||||
| Trading account assets: |
||||||||||||||||
| Asset-backed securities |
— | 17,525 | — | 17,525 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage-baked securities |
— | 5,180 | — | 5,180 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total |
— | 22,705 | — | 22,705 | ||||||||||||
| Equity securities, available for sale |
8,920 | 8,695 | 1,792 | 19,407 | ||||||||||||
| Short-term investments |
50,989 | 195,915 | — | 246,904 | ||||||||||||
| Cash equivalents |
42,040 | 237,871 | — | 279,911 | ||||||||||||
| Other long term investments |
— | 15,195 | — | 15,195 | ||||||||||||
| Other assets |
— | 48,071 | (222,491 | ) | (174,420 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Sub-total excluding separate account assets |
101,949 | 6,461,935 | (111,879 | ) | 6,452,005 | |||||||||||
| Separate account assets (1) |
1,654,810 | 41,415,830 | 198,451 | 43,269,091 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 1,756,759 | $ | 47,877,765 | $ | 86,572 | $ | 49,721,096 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Future policy benefits |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | (452,822 | ) | $ | (452,822 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total liabilities |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | (452,822 | ) | $ | (452,822 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account assets classified as Level 3 consist primarily of real estate and real estate investment funds. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. |
The methods and assumptions the Company uses to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below. Information regarding separate account assets is excluded as the risk associated with these assets is primarily borne by the customers and policyholders.
Fixed Maturity Securities - The fair values of the Company’s public fixed maturity securities are generally based on prices obtained from independent pricing services. Prices from pricing services are sourced from multiple vendors, and a vendor hierarchy is maintained by asset type based on historical pricing experience and vendor expertise. The Company generally receives prices from multiple pricing services for each security, but ultimately uses the price from the pricing service highest in the vendor hierarchy based on the respective asset type. To validate reasonableness, prices are reviewed by internal asset managers through comparison with directly observed recent market trades and internal estimates of current fair value, developed using market observable inputs and economic indicators. Consistent with the fair value hierarchy described above, securities with validated quotes from pricing services are generally reflected within Level 2, as they are primarily based on observable pricing for similar assets and/or other market observable inputs. If the pricing information received from third party pricing services is not reflective of market activity or other inputs observable in the market, the Company may challenge the price through a formal process with the pricing service. If the pricing service updates the price to be more consistent in comparison to the presented market observations, the security remains within Level 2.
If the Company ultimately concludes that pricing information received from the independent pricing service is not reflective of market activity, non-binding broker quotes are used, if available. If the Company concludes the values from both pricing services and brokers are not reflective of market activity, it may over-ride the information from the pricing service or broker with an internally-developed valuation. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, over-rides on a net basis were not material. Internally-developed valuations or non-binding broker quotes are also used to determine fair value in circumstances where vendor pricing is not available. These estimates may use significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Circumstances where observable market data are not available may include events such as market illiquidity and credit events related to the security. Pricing service over-rides, internally-developed valuations and non-binding broker quotes are generally included in Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of private fixed maturities, which are primarily comprised of investments in private placement securities, originated by internal private asset managers, are primarily determined using a discounted cash flow model. In certain cases these models primarily use observable inputs with a discount rate based upon the average of spread surveys collected from private market intermediaries who are active in both primary and secondary transactions, taking into account, among other factors, the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and the reduced liquidity associated with private placements. Generally, these securities have been reflected within Level 2. For certain private fixed maturities, the discounted cash flow model may also incorporate significant unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs market participants
27
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
would use in pricing the asset. To the extent management determines that such unobservable inputs are not significant to the price of a security, a Level 2 classification is made. Otherwise, a Level 3 classification is used.
Private fixed maturities also include debt investments in funds that, in addition to a stated coupon, pay a return based upon the results of the underlying portfolios. The fair values of these securities are determined by reference to the funds’ net asset value (“NAV”). Since the NAV at which the funds trade can be observed by redemption and subscription transactions between third parties, the fair values of these investments have been reflected within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Trading Account Assets – Trading account assets consist primarily of asset-backed securities, public corporate bonds and commercial mortgage-backed securities whose fair values are determined consistent with similar instruments described above under “Fixed Maturity Securities” and below under “Equity Securities.”
Equity Securities – Equity securities consist principally of investments in common and preferred stock of publicly traded companies, perpetual preferred stock, privately traded securities, as well as common stock mutual fund shares. The fair values of most publicly traded equity securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and are classified within Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Estimated fair values for most privately traded equity securities are determined using valuation and discounted cash flow models that require a substantial level of judgment. In determining the fair value of certain privately traded equity securities the discounted cash flow model may also use unobservable inputs, which reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset. Most privately traded equity securities are classified within Level 3. The fair values of common stock mutual fund shares that transact regularly (but do not trade in active markets because they are not publicly available) are based on transaction prices of identical fund shares and are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of preferred equity securities are based on prices obtained from independent pricing services. These prices are then validated for reasonableness against recently traded market prices. Accordingly, these securities are generally classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair values of perpetual preferred stock based on observable market inputs are classified within Level 2. However, when prices from independent pricing services are based on non-binding broker quotes as the directly observable market inputs become unavailable, the fair value of perpetual preferred stock are classified as Level 3.
Derivative Instruments - Derivatives are recorded at fair value either as assets, within “Other long-term investments,” or as liabilities, within “Other liabilities,” except for embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host contract. The fair values of derivative contracts are determined based on quoted prices in active exchanges or through the use of valuation models. The fair values of derivative contracts can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, credit spreads, market volatility, expected returns, non-performance risk and liquidity as well as other factors. Liquidity valuation adjustments are made to reflect the cost of exiting significant risk positions, and consider the bid-ask spread, maturity, complexity, and other specific attributes of the underlying derivative position. Fair values can also be affected by changes in estimates and assumptions including those related to counterparty behavior used in valuation models.
The majority of the Company’s derivative positions are traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative market and are classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. OTC derivatives classified within Level 2 are valued using models generally accepted in the financial services industry that use actively quoted or observable market input values from external market data providers, third-party pricing vendors and/or recent trading activity. The fair values of most OTC derivatives, including interest rate and cross currency swaps, currency forward contracts, commodity swaps, commodity forward contracts, single name credit default swaps, loan commitments held for sale and to-be-announced (“TBA”) forward contracts on highly rated mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government sponsored entities are determined using discounted cash flow models. The fair values of European style option contracts are determined using Black-Scholes option pricing models. These models’ key assumptions include the contractual terms of the respective contract, along with significant observable inputs, including interest rates, currency rates, credit spreads, equity prices, index dividend yields, non-performance risk and volatility and are classified as Level 2.
To reflect the market’s perception of its own and the counterparty’s non-performance risk, the Company incorporates additional spreads over London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) into the discount rate used in determining the fair value of OTC derivative assets and liabilities. However, the non-performance risk adjustment is applied only to the uncollateralized portion of the OTC derivative assets and liabilities, after consideration of the impacts of two-way collateral posting. Most OTC derivative contract inputs have bid and ask prices that are actively quoted or can be readily obtained from external market data providers. The Company’s policy is to use mid-market pricing in determining its best estimate of fair value and classify these derivative contracts as Level 2.
Derivatives classified as Level 3 may include first-to-default credit basket swaps, look back equity options, and other structured products. These derivatives are valued based upon models with some significant unobservable market inputs or inputs from less actively traded markets. The fair values of first to default credit basket swaps are derived from relevant observable inputs such as: individual credit default spreads, interest rates, recovery rates and unobservable model-specific input values such as correlation between different credits within the same basket. Look-back equity options and other structured options and derivatives are valued using simulation models such as the Monte Carlo technique. The input values for look-back equity options are derived from observable market indices such as interest rates, dividend yields, equity indices as well as unobservable model-specific input values such as certain volatility parameters. Level 3 methodologies are validated through periodic comparison of the Company’s fair values to broker-dealer values.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments - Cash equivalents and short-term investments include money market instruments, commercial paper and other highly liquid debt instruments. Money market instruments are generally valued using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible for identical assets and are primarily classified as Level 1. The remaining instruments in the Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments category are typically not traded in active markets; however, their fair values are based on market observable inputs and, accordingly, these investments have been classified within Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
28
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Other Assets - Other assets carried at fair value include reinsurance recoverables related to the reinsurance of our living benefit guarantees on certain of our variable annuities and an affiliated security issued by certain investment subsidiaries of Prudential Insurance. These guarantees are described further below in “Future Policy Benefits.” Also included in other assets are certain universal life products that contain a no-lapse guarantee provision. The reinsurance agreements covering these guarantees are derivatives and are accounted for in the same manner as an embedded derivative.
Future Policy Benefits - The liability for future policy benefits includes general account liabilities for guarantees on variable annuity contracts, including guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits (“GMAB”), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) and guaranteed minimum income and withdrawal benefits (“GMIWB”), accounted for as embedded derivatives. The fair values of the GMAB, GMWB, and GMIWB liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefit payments to customers less the present value of assessed rider fees attributable to the embedded derivative feature. This methodology could result in either a liability or asset balance, given changing capital market conditions and various policyholder behavior assumptions. Since there is no observable active market for the transfer of these obligations, the valuations are calculated using internally developed models with option pricing techniques. The models are based on a risk neutral valuation framework and incorporate premiums for risks inherent in valuation techniques, inputs, and the general uncertainty around the timing and amount of future cash flows. The determination of these risk premiums requires the use of management judgment.
The Company is also required to incorporate the market-perceived risk of its own non-performance in the valuation of the embedded derivatives associated with its optional living benefit features and no-lapse feature on certain universal life products. Since insurance liabilities are senior to debt, the Company believes that reflecting the financial strength ratings of the Company in the valuation of the liability appropriately takes into consideration the Company’s own risk of non-performance. To reflect the market’s perception of its non-performance risk, the Company incorporates an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuations of the embedded derivatives associated with its optional living benefit features. The additional spread over LIBOR is determined taking into consideration publicly available information relating to the financial strength of the Company. The additional spread over LIBOR incorporated into the discount rate as of September 30, 2011 generally ranged from 125 to 250 basis points for the portion of the interest rate curve most relevant to these liabilities.
Other significant inputs to the valuation models for the embedded derivatives associated with the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity products include capital market assumptions, such as interest rate and implied volatility assumptions, as well as various policyholder behavior assumptions that are actuarially determined, including lapse rates, benefit utilization rates, mortality rates and withdrawal rates. These assumptions are reviewed at least annually, and updated based upon historical experience and give consideration to any observable market data, including market transactions such as acquisitions and reinsurance transactions. Since many of the assumptions utilized in the valuation of the embedded derivatives associated with the Company’s optional living benefit features are unobservable and are considered to be significant inputs to the liability valuation, the liability included in future policy benefits has been reflected within Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Significant declines in interest rates and the impact of equity market declines on account values in 2011 drove increases in the embedded derivative liabilities associated with the optional living benefit features of the Company’s variable annuity products as of September 30, 2011. These factors, as well as widening of the spreads used in valuing non-performance risk (“NPR”), also drove offsetting increases in the adjustment to incorporate NPR in the valuation of the embedded derivative. As of September 30, 2011, the fair value of the embedded derivatives associated with the optional living benefit features before the adjustment for NPR, was a net liability of $4,085 million. This net liability was comprised of $4,198 million of embedded derivative liabilities net of $113 million of assets. At September 30, 2011, the adjustment for the NPR resulted in a $3,121 million cumulative decrease to the embedded derivative liability. As described in Note 8 the Company uses affiliated reinsurance as part of its risk management strategy for certain of the optional living benefit features. As a result, the increase in these embedded derivative liabilities are largely offset by corresponding increases in the reinsurance recoverable associated with the affiliated reinsurance.
Transfers between Levels 1 and 2 - During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no material transfers between Level 1 and Level 2.
Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities - The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2011.
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - U.S. Treasury Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Corporate Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Asset- Backed Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
Equity Securities, Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | 4,700 | $ | 48,015 | $ | 56,389 | $ | 5,019 | $ | 11,176 | ||||||||||
| Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (629 | ) | (3 | ) | — | (476 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(2 | ) | (762 | ) | (725 | ) | - | 372 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | 34 | 108 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases |
— | 76 | — | — | 1,001 | |||||||||||||||
| Sales |
— | (11 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Issuances |
— | 104 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Settlements |
— | (887 | ) | (3,336 | ) | — | (98 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | 0 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | (12,955 | ) | — | (5,019 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
| Other |
— | — | — | — | (8,957 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
4,698 | 32,985 | 52,433 | — | 3,018 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (623 | ) | (3 | ) | — | (476 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(2 | ) | (762 | ) | (702 | ) | — | 372 | ||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Trading Account Assets - Equity Securities |
Other Long-Term Investments |
Other Assets | Separate Account Assets (1) |
Future Policy Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | — | $ | 200 | $ | (370,436 | ) | $ | 219,789 | $ | (592,022 | ) | ||||||||
| Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | 69 | 1,327,080 | 39 | 1,484,243 | |||||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
(563 | ) | (136 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | — | (5,669 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | — | (2,606 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | — | 162,426 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases |
— | 526 | (106,519 | ) | 66,744 | 72,086 | ||||||||||||||
| Sales |
— | — | — | (60,412 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Issuances |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Settlements |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Other |
8,957 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
8,394 | 659 | 1,009,945 | 220,491 | 964,307 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | 69 | 1,323,537 | — | (1,482,018 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
(563 | ) | (65 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | — | (5,670 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | — | (2,606 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. |
| (2) | Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. |
| (3) | Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts. |
Transfers – Transfers out of Level 3 for Corporate Securities totaled $12.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 resulting from the Company’s ongoing monitoring of pricing inputs to ensure appropriateness of the level classification in the fair value hierarchy. In the third quarter of 2011, the pricing and valuation methodology related to an affiliated bond was re-evaluated and subsequently updated to utilize observable inputs. Other transfers out of Level 3 were typically due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company was able to validate. Transfers into Level 3 were primarily the result of unobservable inputs utilized within valuation methodologies and the use of broker quotes (that could not be validated) when previously, information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) was utilized.
30
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - U.S. Treasury Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Corporate Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Asset- Backed Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
Equity Securities, Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | — | $ | 49,050 | $ | 59,770 | $ | — | $ | 1,792 | ||||||||||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (2,330 | ) | 803 | — | (2,918 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(2 | ) | (1,006 | ) | (316 | ) | — | 2,809 | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | 182 | 706 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases |
4,700 | 7,491 | 11,089 | 5,019 | 1,696 | |||||||||||||||
| Sales |
— | (672 | ) | (8,160 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Issuances |
— | 781 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Settlements |
— | (13,756 | ) | (7,494 | ) | — | (99 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | 10,444 | — | — | 8,695 | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | (17,199 | ) | (3,965 | ) | (5,019 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
| Other |
— | — | — | — | (8,957 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
4,698 | 32,985 | 52,433 | — | 3,018 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (4,319 | ) | (10 | ) | — | (2,918 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(2 | ) | (549 | ) | (103 | ) | — | 2,823 | ||||||||||||
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Trading Account Assets - Equity Securities |
Other Long-Term Investments |
Other Assets | Separate Account Assets (1) |
Future Policy Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | (222,491 | ) | $ | 198,451 | $ | (452,822 | ) | ||||||||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | 269 | 1,096,659 | 387 | 1,224,031 | |||||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
(563 | ) | (136 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | — | 4,321 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | — | (2,429 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | — | 162,426 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases |
— | 526 | 432 | 77,744 | 193,099 | |||||||||||||||
| Sales |
— | — | — | (60,412 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Issuances |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Settlements |
— | — | (3 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | — | (24,651 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Other |
8,957 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
8,394 | 659 | 1,009,943 | 220,491 | 964,308 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | 244 | 1,093,402 | — | (1,220,003 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
(563 | ) | (136 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | 4,321 | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | — | (2,429 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent of minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. |
| (2) | Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. |
| (3) | Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts. |
Transfers – Transfers out of Level 3 for Other Assets totaled $24.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 resulting from the Company’s ongoing monitoring of pricing inputs to ensure appropriateness of the level classification in the fair value hierarchy. In the third quarter of 2011, the pricing and valuation methodology related to an affiliated bond was re-evaluated and subsequently updated to utilize observable inputs. Other transfers out of Level 3 were typically due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company was able to validate. Transfers into Level 3 were primarily the result of unobservable inputs utilized within valuation methodologies and the use of broker quotes (that could not be validated) when previously, information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) was utilized.
Changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities – The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities held at September 30, 2010.
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Foreign Government Bonds |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Corporate Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Asset- Backed Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
Equity Securities, Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | 1,070 | $ | 36,197 | $ | 58,245 | $ | — | $ | 2,615 | ||||||||||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (746 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | 689 | 3,019 | — | (545 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | 71 | 213 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
— | 692 | (1,553 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
(1,070 | ) | (1,498 | ) | (1,141 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
$ | — | $ | 35,405 | $ | 58,783 | $ | — | $ | 2,070 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | — | $ | (808 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
| Asset management fees and other income |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | — | $ | 688 | $ | 3,020 | $ | — | $ | (545 | ) | |||||||||
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Other Assets | Separate Account Assets (1) |
Other Long- Term Investments |
Future Policy Benefits |
|||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | 357,453 | $ | 164,924 | $ | (501 | ) | $ | (202,964 | ) | ||||||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
(52,558 | ) | (90 | ) | 449 | 64,607 | ||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | 2,372 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
5,543 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
23,717 | 1,249 | — | (27,165 | ) | |||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
$ | 334,155 | $ | 168,455 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (165,522 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
32
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | (54,361 | ) | $ | — | $ | 461 | $ | 63,567 | |||||||
| Asset management fees and other income |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
$ | — | $ | 2,372 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 5,543 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. |
| (2) | Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. |
| (3) | Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts. |
Transfers – Transfers out of Level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale – Asset-Backed Securities totaled $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 resulting from the Company’s conclusion that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages became increasingly active, as evidenced by orderly transactions. The pricing received from independent pricing services could be validated by the Company, as discussed in detail above. Other transfers out of Level 3 were typically due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company was able to validate. Transfers into Level 3 were primarily the result of unobservable inputs utilized within valuation methodologies and the use of broker quotes (that could not be validated) when previously, information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) was utilized.
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Foreign Government Bonds |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Corporate Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Asset- Backed Securities |
Fixed Maturities Available For Sale - Commercial Mortgage- Backed Securities |
Equity Securities, Available for Sale |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | 1,082 | $ | 32,462 | $ | 135,466 | $ | — | $ | 3,833 | ||||||||||
| Total gains (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | (657 | ) | (1,322 | ) | — | (90 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
(11 | ) | 1,138 | (1,404 | ) | 82 | (1,673 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
(1 | ) | 193 | 468 | (7 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
— | (5,940 | ) | 1,736 | 5,160 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | 9,846 | 4,525 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
(1,070 | ) | (1,637 | ) | (80,686 | ) | (5,235 | ) | — | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
$ | — | $ | 35,405 | $ | 58,783 | $ | — | $ | 2,070 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | — | $ | (878 | ) | $ | (751 | ) | $ | — | $ | (90 | ) | |||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (11 | ) | $ | 1,607 | $ | (1,456 | ) | $ | 126 | $ | (1,673 | ) | |||||||
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading Account Assets - Asset Backed Securities |
Other Assets | Separate Account Assets (1) |
Other Long-Term Investments |
Future Policy Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | 1,182 | $ | 159,618 | $ | 152,675 | $ | (960 | ) | $ | 17,539 | |||||||||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
— | 113,385 | (790 | ) | 908 | (118,850 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
18 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
— | — | 2,692 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
— | 6,539 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Net investment income |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements |
(1,200 | ) | 54,613 | 13,878 | — | (64,211 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers into Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Transfers out of Level 3 (2) |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Fair value, end of period |
$ | — | $ | 334,155 | $ | 168,455 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (165,522 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those Level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period (3): |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | — | $ | 114,476 | $ | — | $ | 921 | $ | (127,356 | ) | |||||||||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
$ | 18 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Interest credited to policyholder account balances |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,692 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
| Included in other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | — | $ | 6,539 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
| (1) | Separate account assets represent segregated funds that are invested for certain customers. Investment risks associated with market value changes are borne by the customers, except to the extent minimum guarantees made by the Company with respect to certain accounts. Separate account liabilities are not included in the above table as they are reported at contract value and not fair value in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. |
| (2) | Transfers into or out of Level 3 are generally reported as the value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurs. |
| (3) | Unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the end of the period do not include amortization or accretion of premiums and discounts. |
Transfers – Transfers out of Level 3 for Fixed Maturities Available for Sale – Asset-Backed Securities totaled $80.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 resulting from the Company’s conclusion that the market for asset-backed securities collateralized by sub-prime mortgages became increasingly active, as evidenced by orderly transactions. The pricing received from independent pricing services could be validated by the Company, as discussed in detail above. Other transfers out of Level 3 were typically due to the use of observable inputs in valuation methodologies as well as the utilization of pricing service information for certain assets that the Company was able to validate. Transfers into Level 3 were primarily the result of unobservable inputs utilized within valuation methodologies and the use of broker quotes (that could not be validated) when previously, information from third party pricing services (that could be validated) was utilized.
Derivative Fair Value Information – The following tables present the balance of derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as of the date indicated. These tables exclude embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host contract. The derivative assets and liabilities shown below are included in “Other long-term investments” or “Other liabilities” in the tables presented previously in this note, under the headings “Assets and Liabilities by Hierarchy Level” and “Changes in Level 3 Assets and Liabilities.” The amounts in the Hierarchy Level columns below represent the gross fair value of derivative contracts prior to taking into account the netting effects of master netting agreements and cash collateral held with the same counterparty. This netting impact is reflected in the netting column below, as well as in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
| As of September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting (1) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | — | $ | 94,718 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 94,718 | ||||||||||
| Currency |
— | 374 | — | — | 374 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit |
— | 109 | 269 | — | 378 | |||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
— | 5,162 | — | — | 5,162 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity |
— | 9,222 | — | — | 9,222 | |||||||||||||||
| Netting (1) |
— | — | — | (5,716 | ) | (5,716 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total derivative assets: |
$ | — | $ | 109,585 | $ | 269 | $ | (5,716 | ) | $ | 104,138 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | — | $ | 2,798 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,798 | ||||||||||
| Currency |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Credit |
— | 840 | — | — | 840 | |||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
— | 1,902 | — | — | 1,902 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity |
— | 176 | — | — | 176 | |||||||||||||||
| Netting (1) |
— | — | — | (5,716 | ) | (5,716 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total derivative liabilities: |
$ | — | $ | 5,716 | $ | — | $ | (5,716 | ) | $ | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
34
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Netting (1) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | — | $ | 19,171 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 19,171 | ||||||||||
| Currency |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Credit |
— | 1,206 | — | — | 1,206 | |||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
— | 3,627 | — | — | 3,627 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity |
— | 2,749 | — | — | 2,749 | |||||||||||||||
| Netting (1) |
— | — | — | (11,557 | ) | (11,557 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total derivative assets: |
$ | — | $ | 26,753 | $ | — | $ | (11,557 | ) | $ | 15,195 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | — | $ | 4,738 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 4,738 | ||||||||||
| Currency |
— | 43 | — | — | 43 | |||||||||||||||
| Credit |
— | 1,653 | — | — | 1,653 | |||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
— | 3,998 | — | — | 3,998 | |||||||||||||||
| Equity |
— | 1,125 | — | — | 1,125 | |||||||||||||||
| Netting (1) |
— | — | — | (11,557 | ) | (11,557 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| Total derivative liabilities: |
$ | — | $ | 11,557 | $ | — | $ | (11,557 | ) | $ | — | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| (1) | “Netting” amounts represent cash collateral and the impact of offsetting asset and liability positions held with the same counterparty. |
Changes in Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities – The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, as well as the portion of gains or losses included in income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, attributable to unrealized gains or losses related to those assets and liabilities still held at September 30, 2011.
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
||||
| Other Long-Term Investment Derivative Asset |
||||
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Fair Value, beginning of period |
$ | — | ||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized) |
||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
269 | |||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | |||
| Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
— | |||
| Transfers into Level 3 |
— | |||
| Transfers out of Level 3 |
— | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Fair Value, end of period |
$ | 269 | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period: |
||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
244 | |||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | |||
35
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 |
||||
| Other Long-Term Investment Derivative Asset |
||||
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Fair Value, beginning of period |
$ | 200 | ||
| Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized) |
||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
69 | |||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | |||
| Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements |
— | |||
| Foreign currency translation |
— | |||
| Other (1) |
— | |||
| Transfers into Level 3 |
— | |||
| Transfers out of Level 3 |
— | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Fair Value, end of period |
$ | 269 | ||
|
|
|
|||
| Unrealized gains (losses) for the period relating to those level 3 assets that were still held at the end of the period: |
||||
| Included in earnings: |
||||
| Realized investment gains (losses), net |
$ | 69 | ||
| Asset administration fees and other income |
— | |||
Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The Company is required by U.S. GAAP to disclose the fair value of certain financial instruments including those that are not carried at fair value. For the following financial instruments the carrying amount equals or approximates fair value: fixed maturities classified as available for sale, trading account assets, equity securities, securities purchased under agreements to resell, short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income, separate account assets, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and cash collateral for loaned securities, as well as certain items recorded within other assets and other liabilities such as broker-dealer related receivables and payables. See Note 5 for a discussion of derivative instruments.
The following table discloses the Company’s financial instruments where the carrying amounts and fair values differs:
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Carrying Amount | Fair value | Carrying Amount | Fair value | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
| Commercial mortgage and other loans |
$ | 1,372,615 | $ | 1,493,262 | $ | 1,275,022 | $ | 1,352,761 | ||||||||
| Policy loans |
1,047,090 | 1,380,263 | 1,061,607 | 1,258,411 | ||||||||||||
| Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Policyholder account balances - Investment contracts |
653,114 | 649,189 | 588,200 | 584,112 | ||||||||||||
| Short-term and long-term debt to affiliates |
1,145,000 | 1,155,347 | 895,000 | 898,115 | ||||||||||||
Commercial mortgage and other loans
The fair value of commercial mortgage and other loans is primarily based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the appropriate U.S. Treasury rate adjusted for appropriate credit spread. The credit spreads, a significant component of the pricing input, are based on internally developed methodology which takes into account, among other factors, credit quality of the loans, property type of the collateral, competitive pricing feedback and market indicators.
Policy Loans
The fair value of policy loans is calculated using a discounted cash flow model based upon current U.S. Treasury rates and historical loan repayment patterns.
36
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
Investment Contracts – Policyholders’ Account Balances
Only the portion of policyholders’ account balances related to products that are investment contracts (those without significant mortality or morbidity risk) are reflected in the table above. For fixed deferred annuities, payout annuities and other similar contracts without life contingencies, fair values are derived using discounted projected cash flows based on interest rates that are representative of the Company’s claims paying ratings, and hence reflect the Company’s own nonperformance risk. For those balances that can be withdrawn by the customer at any time without prior notice or penalty, the fair value is the amount estimated to be payable to the customer as of the reporting date, which is generally the carrying value.
Short-term and long-term debt to affiliates
The fair value of short-term and long-term debt is generally determined by either prices obtained from independent pricing services, which are validated by the Company, or discounted cash flow models. These fair values consider the Company’s own non-performance risk. Discounted cash flow models predominately use market observable inputs such as the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt and financial instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. For commercial paper issuances and other debt with a maturity of less than 90 days, the carrying value approximates fair value.
| 5. | DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
Types of Derivative Instruments and Derivative Strategies
Interest Rate Contracts
Interest rate swaps are used by the Company to manage interest rate exposures arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (including duration mismatches) and to hedge against changes in the value of assets it anticipates acquiring and other anticipated transactions and commitments. Swaps may be attributed to specific assets or liabilities or may be used on a portfolio basis. Under interest rate swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount. Generally, no cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract and no principal payments are made by either party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty at each due date.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Currency derivatives, including currency swaps and forwards, are used by the Company to reduce risks from changes in currency exchange rates with respect to investments denominated in foreign currencies that the Company either holds or intends to acquire or sell.
Under currency swaps, the Company agrees with other parties to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at an exchange rate and calculated by reference to an agreed principal amount. Generally, the principal amount of each currency is exchanged at the beginning and termination of the currency swap by each party. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty for payments made in the same currency at each due date.
Credit Contracts
Credit derivatives are used by the Company to enhance the return on the Company’s investment portfolio by creating credit exposure similar to an investment in public fixed maturity cash instruments. With credit derivatives the Company can sell credit protection on an identified name, or a basket of names in a first to default structure, and in return receive a quarterly premium. With first to default baskets, the premium generally corresponds to a high proportion of the sum of the credit spreads of the names in the basket. If there is an event of default by the referenced name or one of the referenced names in a basket, as defined by the agreement, then the Company is obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the referenced defaulted security or similar security. In addition to selling credit protection, the Company may purchase credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio.
Embedded Derivatives
The Company sells variable annuity contracts that include certain optional living benefit features that are treated as embedded derivatives. The Company has reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain of these embedded derivatives to an affiliate, Pruco Reinsurance Ltd. (“Pruco Re”). The embedded derivatives related to the living benefit features and the related reinsurance agreements are carried at fair value. Mark-to-market changes in the fair value of the underlying contractual guarantees are determined using valuation models as described in Note 7, and are recorded in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.”
The fair value of the living benefit feature embedded derivatives included in “Future policy benefits” was a liability of $964 million as of September 30, 2011 and an asset of $453 million as of December 31, 2010. The fair value of the embedded derivatives related to the reinsurance of certain of
37
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
these benefits to Pruco Re included in “Reinsurance recoverables” was an asset of $886 million as of September 30, 2011 and a contra-asset of $373 million as of December 31, 2010.
Some of the Company’s universal life products contain a no-lapse guarantee provision that is reinsured with an affiliate, UPARC. The reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative related to the interest rate risk of the reinsurance contract. Interest sensitivity can result in mark-to-market changes in the value of the underlying contractual guarantees, as well as actual activity related to premium and benefits. In third quarter 2011, the Company amended this reinsurance agreement resulting in a recapture of a portion of the no-lapse guarantee provision effective July 1, 2011. The recaptured premium of $313 million associated with this amendment was recorded in “Reinsurance recoverables”.
As discussed in Note 2, the settlement of the recaptured premium occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date. As a result, the recaptured premium was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between this date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from an asset portfolio within UPARC. This settlement feature is accounted for as an embedded derivative. The fair value of this embedded derivative included in “Reinsurance recoverables” was $39 million as of September 30, 2011. Concurrent with the recapture discussed above, the Company entered into a new coinsurance agreement with an affiliate, PAR U. The settlement of the initial coinsurance premium also occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date and contains a settlement provision similar to the recapture premium, discussed above. The adjustment to the initial coinsurance premium was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from both an asset portfolio within the Company, as well as an asset portfolio in UPARC. The settlement feature of this agreement is accounted for as an embedded derivative. The fair value of this embedded derivative included in “Other liabilities” was $62 million as of September 30, 2011. Realized investment gains including these transactions were $282 million for the first nine months of 2011 compared to $14 million realized losses for the first nine months of 2010.
The table below provides a summary of the gross notional amount and fair value of derivatives contracts, excluding embedded derivatives which are recorded with the associated host, by the primary underlying. Many derivative instruments contain multiple underlyings.
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| -Primary Underlying/ -Instrument Type |
Notional Amount |
Fair Value | Notional Amount |
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualifying Hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
$ | 46,749 | $ | 2,914 | $ | (827 | ) | $ | 46,749 | $ | 2,193 | $ | (1,152 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total Qualifying Hedges |
$ | 46,749 | $ | 2,914 | $ | (827 | ) | $ | 46,749 | $ | 2,193 | $ | (1,152 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Non-Qualifying Hedges |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | 841,900 | $ | 94,718 | $ | (2,798 | ) | $ | 481,500 | $ | 19,170 | $ | (4,738 | ) | ||||||||||
| Currency |
8,848 | 374 | — | 2,109 | — | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
| Credit |
73,000 | 378 | (840 | ) | 16,900 | 1,206 | (1,653 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
44,736 | 2,248 | (1,076 | ) | 51,943 | 1,434 | (2,846 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Equity |
157,483 | 9,221 | (176 | ) | 93,955 | 2,749 | (1,125 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total Non-Qualifying Hedges |
1,125,967 | 106,939 | (4,890 | ) | 646,407 | 24,559 | (10,405 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total Derivatives |
$ | 1,172,716 | $ | 109,853 | $ | (5,717 | ) | $ | 693,156 | $ | 26,752 | $ | (11,557 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | Excludes embedded derivatives which contain multiple underlyings. The fair value of these embedded derivatives was a liability of $964 million as of September 30, 2011 and an asset of $453 million as of December 31, 2010 included in “Future policy benefits” and “Fixed maturities available for sale.” |
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company uses currency swaps in its cash flow hedge accounting relationships. This instrument is only designated for hedge accounting in instances where the appropriate criteria are met. The Company does not use futures, options, credit, and equity or embedded derivatives in any of its cash flow hedge accounting relationships.
The following table provides the financial statement classification and impact of derivatives used in qualifying and non-qualifying hedge relationships, excluding the offset of the hedged item in an effective hedge relationship:
38
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Qualifying Hedges |
||||||||||||||||
| Cash flow hedges |
||||||||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
$ | 44 | $ | 137 | $ | 184 | $ | 359 | ||||||||
| Other income |
39 | (44 | ) | (57 | ) | 119 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (1) |
3,663 | (7,461 | ) | 1,055 | 3,688 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total cash flow hedges |
3,746 | (7,368 | ) | 1,182 | 4,166 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Non-qualifying hedges |
||||||||||||||||
| Realized investment gains (losses) |
||||||||||||||||
| Interest Rate |
$ | 70,919 | $ | 16,669 | $ | 81,333 | $ | 48,998 | ||||||||
| Currency |
661 | (232 | ) | 259 | 130 | |||||||||||
| Currency/Interest Rate |
3,901 | (4,010 | ) | 1,408 | 2,882 | |||||||||||
| Credit |
912 | (996 | ) | 747 | (669 | ) | ||||||||||
| Equity |
16,497 | (7,933 | ) | 13,244 | 6,652 | |||||||||||
| Embedded Derivatives |
109,257 | 10,224 | 127,311 | (16,526 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total non-qualifying hedges |
202,147 | 13,722 | 224,302 | 41,467 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Derivative Impact |
$ | 205,893 | $ | 6,354 | $ | 225,484 | $ | 45,633 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| (1) | Amounts deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).” |
For the period ending September 30, 2011, the ineffective portion of derivatives accounted for using hedge accounting was not material to the Company’s results of operations and there were no material amounts reclassified into earnings relating to instances in which the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transaction did not occur by the anticipated date or within the additional time period permitted by the authoritative guidance for the accounting for derivatives and hedging.
Presented below is a roll forward of current period cash flow hedges in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” before taxes:
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 808 | ||
| Net deferred gains on cash flow hedges from January 1 to September 30, 2011 |
1,031 | |||
| Amount reclassified into current period earnings |
174 | |||
|
|
|
|||
| Balance, September 30, 2011 |
$ | 2,013 | ||
|
|
|
|||
As of September 30, 2011 the Company did not have any qualifying cash flow hedges of forecasted transactions other than those related to the variability of the payment or receipt of interest or foreign currency amounts on existing financial instruments. The maximum length of time for which these variable cash flows are hedged is 6 years. Income amounts deferred in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” as a result of cash flow hedges are included in “Net unrealized investment gains (losses)” in the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Equity.
Credit Derivatives Written
The Company holds certain externally managed investments in the European market which contain embedded derivatives whose fair value are primarily driven by changes in credit spreads. These investments are medium term notes that are collateralized by investment portfolios primarily consisting of investment grade European fixed income securities, including corporate bonds and asset-backed securities, and derivatives, as well as varying degrees of leverage. The notes have a stated coupon and provide a return based on the performance of the underlying portfolios and the level of leverage. The Company invests in these notes to earn a coupon through maturity, consistent with its investment purpose for other debt securities. The notes are accounted for under U.S. GAAP as available for sale fixed maturity securities with bifurcated embedded derivatives (total return swaps). Changes in the value of the fixed maturity securities are reported in Equity under the heading “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” and changes in the market value of the embedded total return swaps are included in current period earnings in “Realized investment gains (losses), net.” The Company’s maximum exposure to loss from these interests was $87 million at September 30, 2011 and $91 million at December 31, 2010. The fair value of the embedded derivatives included in Fixed maturities, available for sale was a liability of $33 million at September 30, 2011 and $30 million at December 31, 2010.
The following tables set forth exposure from credit derivatives where the company has written credit protection excluding embedded derivatives contained in externally-managed investments in the European market, by NAIC rating of the underlying credits as of the dates indicated.
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
| Single Name | ||||||||
| NAIC Designation |
Notional | Fair Value | ||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| 1 |
$ | 58,000 | $ | 269 | ||||
| 2 |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
39
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| 3 |
— | — | ||||||
| 4 |
— | — | ||||||
| 5 |
— | — | ||||||
| 6 |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total |
$ | 58,000 | $ | 269 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
| Single Name | ||||||||
| NAIC Designation |
Notional | Fair Value | ||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| 1 |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
| 2 |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 3 |
— | — | ||||||
| 4 |
— | — | ||||||
| 5 |
— | — | ||||||
| 6 |
— | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Total |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
The following table sets forth the composition of credit derivatives where the Company has written credit protection excluding embedded derivatives contained in externally-managed investments in European markets, by industry category as of the dates indicated.
| September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
| Industry | Notional | Fair Value | Notional | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Finance |
58,000 | 269 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Credit Derivatives |
$ | 58,000 | $ | 269 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Company writes credit derivatives under which the Company is obligated to pay the counterparty the referenced amount of the contract and receive in return the defaulted security or similar security. The Company’s maximum amount at risk under these credit derivatives, assuming the value of the underlying referenced securities become worthless, is $58 million and $0 million notional of credit default swap (“CDS”) selling protection at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These credit derivatives generally have maturities of five to ten years.
In addition to writing credit protection, the Company has purchased credit protection using credit derivatives in order to hedge specific credit exposures in the Company’s investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had $15 million and $17 million of outstanding notional amounts, respectively, reported at fair value as a liability of $1 million and a liability of less than a million, respectively.
Credit Risk
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by our counterparty to financial derivative transactions. Generally, the credit exposure of the Company’s over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions is represented by the contracts with a positive fair value (market value) at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements.
The Company has credit risk exposure to an affiliate, Prudential Global Funding, LLC related to its over-the-counter derivative transactions. Prudential Global Funding, LLC manages credit risk with external counterparties by entering into derivative transactions with highly rated major international financial institutions and other creditworthy counterparties, and by obtaining collateral where appropriate. The Company effects exchange-traded futures transactions through regulated exchanges and these transactions are settled on a daily basis, thereby reducing credit risk exposure in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to such financial instruments.
Under fair value measurements, the Company incorporates the market’s perceptions of its own and the counterparty’s non-performance risk in determining the fair value of the portion of its OTC derivative assets and liabilities that are uncollateralized. Credit spreads are applied to the derivative fair values on a net basis by counterparty. To reflect the Company’s own credit spread a proxy based on relevant debt spreads is applied to OTC derivative net liability positions. Similarly, the Company’s counterparty’s credit spread is applied to OTC derivative net asset positions.
| 6. | COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND LITIGATION AND REGULATORY MATTERS |
Commitments
40
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company has made commitments to fund $31 million of commercial loans as of September 30, 2011. The Company also made commitments to purchase or fund investments, mostly private fixed maturities, of $52 million as of September 30, 2011.
Contingent Liabilities
On an ongoing basis, the Company’s internal supervisory and control functions review the quality of sales, marketing and other customer interface procedures and practices and may recommend modifications or enhancements. From time to time, this review process results in the discovery of product administration, servicing or other errors, including errors relating to the timing or amount of payments or contract values due to customers. In certain cases, if appropriate, the Company may offer customers remediation and may incur charges, including the costs of such remediation, administrative costs and regulatory fines.
The Company is subject to the laws and regulations of states and other jurisdictions concerning the identification, reporting and escheatment of unclaimed or abandoned funds, and is subject to audit and examination for compliance with these requirements. The Company is currently being examined by a third party auditor on behalf of 33 U.S. jurisdictions for compliance with the unclaimed property laws of these jurisdictions. Significant attention has been focused on life insurance companies’ processes and procedures used to identify unreported death claims and whether life insurance companies use the Social Security Master Death File (“SSMDF”) to identify deceased policy and contract holders. The Company is one of several companies subpoenaed by the New York Attorney General regarding its unclaimed property procedures. Additionally, the New York Department of Insurance (“NYDOI”) has requested that 172 life insurers (including the Company) provide data to the NYDOI regarding use of the SSMDF. The New York Office of Unclaimed Funds recently notified the Company that it intends to conduct an audit of the Company’s compliance with New York’s unclaimed property laws. The Company is the subject of a multi-state market conduct exam in connection with use of the SSMDF and insurance claims settlement practices and has received additional inquiries from insurance regulators in states not participating in the third party audit described above. Additionally, regulators and state legislators are considering proposals that would require life insurance companies to take additional steps to identify unreported deceased policy and contract holders. If implemented, the proposals under consideration and any escheatable property identified as a result of the audits could result in: (1) additional payments of previously unreported death claims; (2) the payment of abandoned funds to U.S. jurisdictions; and (3) changes in the Company’s practices and procedures for the identification of escheatable funds, which would impact claim payments and reserves, among other consequences. There does not appear to be a consensus among state insurance regulators and state unclaimed property administrators regarding a life insurer’s obligations in connection with identifying unreported deaths of its policy and contract holders.
The audit described above seeks to use the SSMDF to identify deceased insureds and contract holders where a valid claim has not been made. The Company has historically used the SSMDF to identify deceased insureds and contract holders and then confirmed the information on the SSMDF through other sources or obtained a death certificate. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company increased reserves by $9 million for certain policies and contracts active at any time since January 1, 1992, with respect to which the Company expects a death benefit (including delayed claim interest) to be payable based upon the application of new SSMDF matching criteria and an assumption of death without receipt of a valid claim by or on behalf of a beneficiary or other claim documentation.
It is possible that the results of operations or the cash flow of the Company in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected as a result of payments in connection with the matters discussed above or other matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. Management believes, however, that ultimate payments in connection with these matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, should not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
Litigation and Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of its businesses. Pending legal and regulatory actions include proceedings relating to aspects of the Company’s businesses and operations that are specific to it and proceedings that are typical of the businesses in which it operates. In certain of these matters, the plaintiffs may seek large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages. The outcome of litigation or a regulatory matter, and the amount or range of potential loss at any particular time, is often inherently uncertain.
In January 2011, a purported state-wide class action, Garcia v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America was dismissed by the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, Nevada. The complaint is brought on behalf of Nevada beneficiaries of life insurance policies sold by Prudential for which, unless the beneficiaries elected another settlement method, death benefits were placed in retained asset accounts that earn interest and are subject to withdrawal in whole or in part at any time by the beneficiaries. The complaint alleges that by failing to disclose material information about the accounts, Prudential wrongfully delayed payment and improperly retained undisclosed profits, and seeks damages, injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and prejudgment and post-judgment interest. In February 2011, plaintiff appealed the dismissal. As previously reported, in December 2009, an earlier purported nationwide class action raising substantially similar allegations brought by the same plaintiff in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Garcia v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, was dismissed. In December 2010, a purported state-wide class action complaint, Phillips v. Prudential Financial, Inc., was filed in the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit, Williamson County, Illinois. The complaint makes allegations under Illinois law, substantially similar to the Garcia cases, on behalf of a class of Illinois residents whose death benefits were settled by retained assets accounts. In January 2011, the case was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. In March 2011, the complaint was amended to drop Prudential Financial as a defendant and add Pruco Life Insurance Company as a defendant. The matter is now captioned Phillips v. Prudential Insurance and Pruco Life Insurance Company. In April 2011, a motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed.
In July 2010, a purported nationwide class action that makes allegations similar to those in the Garcia and Phillips actions relating to retained asset accounts of beneficiaries of a group life insurance contract owned by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA Contract”) that covers
41
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
the lives of members and veterans of the U.S. armed forces, Lucey et al. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The complaint challenges the use of retained asset accounts to settle death benefit claims, asserting violations of federal and state law, breach of contract and fraud and seeking compensatory and treble damages and equitable relief. In October 2010, Prudential filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In November 2010, a second purported nationwide class action brought on behalf of the same beneficiaries of the VA Contract, Phillips v. Prudential Insurance Company of America and Prudential Financial, Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, and makes substantially the same claims. In November and December 2010, two additional actions brought on behalf of the same putative class, alleging substantially the same claims and the same relief, Garrett v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America and Prudential Financial, Inc. and Witt v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. In February 2011, Phillips, Garrett and Witt were transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Massachusetts by the Judicial Panel for Multi-District Litigation and consolidated with the Lucey matter as In re Prudential Insurance Company of America SGLI/VGLI Contract Litigation. In March 2011, the motion to dismiss was denied.
In September 2010, Huffman v. The Prudential Insurance Company, a purported nationwide class action brought on behalf of beneficiaries of group life insurance contracts owned by ERISA-governed employee welfare benefit plans was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, alleging that using retained asset accounts in employee welfare benefit plans to settle death benefit claims violates ERISA and seeking injunctive relief and disgorgement of profits. Prudential moved to dismiss the complaint. In April 2011, Prudential withdrew its motion to dismiss the complaint. In May 2011, Prudential filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In July 2011, the court denied the motion.
In July 2010, the Company, along with other life insurance industry participants, received a formal request for information from the State of New York Attorney General’s Office in connection with its investigation into industry practices relating to the use of retained asset accounts. In August 2010, the Company received a similar request for information from the State of Connecticut Attorney General’s Office. The Company is cooperating with these investigations. The Company and Prudential have also been contacted by state insurance regulators and other governmental entities, including the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and Congressional committees regarding retained asset accounts. These matters may result in additional investigations, information requests, claims, hearings, litigation and adverse publicity.
The Company’s litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. It is possible that the Company’s results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation and regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. Management believes, however, that, based on information currently known to it, the ultimate outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position.
As discussed under “Contingent Liabilities” above, the Company is subject to audits and inquiries concerning its handling of unclaimed property. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company increased reserves by $9 million for certain policies and contracts active at any time since January 1, 1992, in respect of which the Company expects a death benefit (including delayed claim interest) to be payable based upon the application of new SSMDF matching criteria and an assumption of death without receipt of a valid claim by or on behalf of a beneficiary or other claim documentation.
| 7. | REINSURANCE |
The Company participates in reinsurance with its affiliates Prudential Insurance, Prudential of Taiwan, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Captive Company, or “PARCC”, UPARC, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company, or “PAR U”, Pruco Reinsurance Ltd., or “Pruco Re”, Prudential Arizona Reinsurance III Company, or “PAR III”, and Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Term Company, or “PAR TERM”, in order to provide risk diversification, additional capacity for future growth and limit the maximum net loss potential. Life reinsurance is accomplished through various plans of reinsurance, primarily yearly renewable term and coinsurance. Reinsurance ceded arrangements do not discharge the Company as the primary insurer. Ceded balances would represent a liability of the Company in the event the reinsurers were unable to meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The likelihood of a material reinsurance liability resulting from such an inability of the reinsurers to meet their obligation is considered to be remote.
The Company has entered into various reinsurance agreements with an affiliate, Pruco Re, to reinsure its living benefit features sold on certain of its annuities as part of its risk management and capital management strategies. For additional details on these agreements, see Note 8.
Reinsurance premiums, commissions, expense reimbursements, benefits and reserves related to reinsured long-duration contracts are accounted for over the life of the underlying reinsured contracts using assumptions consistent with those used to account for the underlying contracts. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers, for long duration reinsurance arrangements, are estimated in a manner consistent with the claim liabilities and policy benefits associated with the reinsured policies. The affiliated reinsurance agreements are described further in Note 8 of the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reinsurance amounts included in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
42
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
| Three Months
Ended September 30, |
Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Gross premium and policy charges and fee income |
$ | 604,228 | $ | 471,362 | $ | 1,882,290 | $ | 1,499,021 | ||||||||
| Reinsurance ceded |
(343,792 | ) | (319,527 | ) | (1,012,000 | ) | (946,056 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Net premiums and policy charges and fee income |
$ | 260,436 | $ | 151,835 | $ | 870,290 | $ | 552,965 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Policyholders’ benefits ceded |
$ | 194,827 | $ | 181,427 | $ | 563,783 | $ | 498,239 | ||||||||
| Realized capital gains/(losses) net, associated with derivatives (1) |
$ | 1,600,752 | $ | (59,795 | ) | $ | 1,354,597 | $ | 96,144 | |||||||
Reinsurance premiums ceded for interest-sensitive life products are accounted for as a reduction of policy charges and fee income. Reinsurance premiums ceded for term insurance products are accounted for as a reduction of premiums.
Realized investment gains and losses include the impact of reinsurance agreements that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are recognized through “Realized investment gains/(losses).” The Company has entered into reinsurance agreements to transfer the risk related to certain living benefit options on variable annuities to Pruco Re. The Company also entered into an agreement with UPARC (See Note 8 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements) to reinsure a portion of the no-lapse guarantee provision on certain universal life products. These reinsurance agreements are derivatives and have been accounted for in the same manner as an embedded derivative. See Note 5 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to the accounting for embedded derivatives.
Reinsurance recoverables included in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
| September 30, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Domestic life insurance-affiliated |
$ | 3,911,580 | $ | 2,153,734 | ||||
| Domestic individual annuities-affiliated |
886,377 | (372,823 | ) | |||||
| Domestic life insurance-unaffiliated |
1,095 | 239 | ||||||
| Taiwan life insurance-affiliated |
957,977 | 946,011 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | 5,757,029 | $ | 2,727,161 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Substantially all reinsurance contracts are with affiliates as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. These contracts are described further in Note 8 of the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
The gross and net amounts of life insurance face amount in force as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:
| September 30, 2011 |
September 30, 2010 |
|||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Gross life insurance face amount in force |
$ | 561,997,354 | $ | 539,990,307 | ||||
| Reinsurance ceded |
(510,779,360 | ) | (486,590,008 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Net life insurance face amount in force |
$ | 51,217,994 | $ | 53,400,299 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 8. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
The Company has extensive transactions and relationships with Prudential Insurance and other affiliates. Although we seek to ensure that these transactions and relationships are fair and reasonable, it is possible that the terms of these transactions are not the same as those that would result from transactions among unrelated parties.
Expense Charges and Allocations
Many of the Company’s expenses are allocations or charges from Prudential Insurance or other affiliates. These expenses can be grouped into general and administrative expenses and agency distribution expenses.
43
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company’s general and administrative expenses are charged to the Company using allocation methodologies based on business production processes. Management believes that the methodology is reasonable and reflects costs incurred by Prudential Insurance to process transactions on behalf of the Company. The Company operates under service and lease agreements whereby services of officers and employees, supplies, use of equipment and office space are provided by Prudential Insurance. The Company reviews its allocation methodology periodically which it may adjust accordingly. General and administrative expenses also include allocations of stock compensation expenses related to a stock option program and a deferred compensation program issued by Prudential Financial. The expense charged to the Company for the stock option program was less than $1 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, and in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010. The expense charged to the Company for the deferred compensation program was $1 million in the third quarter of 2011, $1 million in the third quarter of 2010; and $5 million and $3 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company is charged for its share of employee benefits expenses. These expenses include costs for funded and non-funded contributory and non-contributory defined benefit pension plans. Some of these benefits are based on final group earnings and length of service while others are based on an account balance, which takes into consideration age, service and earnings during career. The Company’s share of net expense for the pension plans was $5 million and $4 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively; and $13 million and $9 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Prudential Insurance sponsors voluntary savings plans for its employees (401(k) plans). The plans provide for salary reduction contributions by employees and matching contributions by the Company of up to 4% of annual salary. The Company’s expense for its share of the voluntary savings plan was $2 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010; and $6 million and $4 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Company is charged distribution expenses from Prudential Insurance’s agency network for both its domestic life and annuity products through a transfer pricing agreement, which is intended to reflect a market based pricing arrangement.
Affiliated Asset Administration Fee Income
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company amended an existing agreement to add AST Investment Services, Inc., formerly known as American Skandia Investment Services, Inc, as a party whereas the Company receives fee income calculated on contractholder separate account balances invested in the Advanced Series Trust, formerly known as American Skandia Trust. Income received from AST Investment Services, Inc. related to this agreement was $40.5 million and $12.0 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively; and $109.4 million and $29.3 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. These revenues are recorded as “Asset administration fees” in the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
The Company participates in a revenue sharing agreement with Prudential Investments LLC, whereby the Company receives fee income from policyholders’ account balances invested in The Prudential Series Fund (“PSF”). Income received from Prudential Investments LLC, related to this agreement was $2.5 million and $2.6 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively; and $8.1 million and $7.6 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. These revenues are recorded as “Asset administration fees” in the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Corporate Owned Life Insurance
The Company has sold four Corporate Owned Life Insurance or, “COLI,” policies to Prudential Insurance, and one to Prudential Financial. The cash surrender value included in separate accounts for these COLI policies was $2.041 billion at September 30, 2011 and $2.061 billion at December 31, 2010, respectively. Fees related to these COLI policies were $8 million and $19 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively; and $24 million and $33 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company retains the majority of the mortality risk associated with these COLI policies.
Reinsurance with Affiliates
UPARC
Through June 30, 2011 the Company, excluding its subsidiaries, reinsured its universal protector policies having no-lapse guarantees with an affiliated company, UPARC. UPARC reinsured an amount equal to 90% of the net amount at risk related to the first $1 million in face amount plus 100% of the net amount at risk related to the face amount in excess of $1 million as well as 100% of the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision of these policies.
Effective July 1, 2011, the agreement between the Company and UPARC to reinsure its universal protector policies having no-lapse guarantees was amended for policies with effective dates prior to January 1, 2011. Under the amended agreement, UPARC reinsures an amount equal to 27% of the net amount at risk related to the first $1 million in face amount plus 30% of the net amount at risk related to the face amount in excess of $1 million as well as 30% of the risk of uncollectible policy charges and fees associated with the no-lapse guarantee provision of these policies. Policies with effective dates January 1, 2011 or later are reinsured with UPARC under the terms described in the previous paragraph. The settlement of the recaptured premium occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date. As a result, the recaptured premium was treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between this date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from an asset portfolio within UPARC.
44
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of these reinsurance transactions.
The portion of this reinsurance contract related to mortality is accounted for as reinsurance. September 30, 2011 amounts include the impact of the recapture. Reinsurance recoverables related to this reinsurance agreement were $18 million and $50 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Fees ceded to UPARC in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $(27) million and $17 million, respectively; and $14 million and $48 million in the nine months ended 2011 and 2010, respectively. 2011 fees ceded include the recapture of $33 million unearned and supplemental premiums on yearly renewable term mortality risk previously ceded to UPARC. Benefits ceded to UPARC in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $3 million and $7 million, respectively; and $32 million and $37 million in the nine months ended 2011 and 2010, respectively. The portion of this reinsurance contract related to the no lapse guarantee provision is accounted for as an embedded derivative. Realized gains (losses) on the no lapse guarantee embedded derivative were $343 million and $(14) million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The above amendment resulted in a recapture gain of $351 million and is included in realized gains in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The underlying asset resulting from this recapture is reflected in “Reinsurance recoverable” in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
PAR U
Effective July 1, 2011, the Company, excluding PLNJ, entered into to an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR U, an affiliated company, to reinsure 70% of all risks associated with its universal protector policies having no lapse guarantees as well as its universal plus policies, with effective dates prior to January 1, 2011. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of this agreement. Under this agreement, an initial reinsurance premium of $2,447 million less a ceding allowance of $1,439 million, was paid to PAR U subsequent to the balance sheet date and treated as if settled on the effective date and adjusted for the time elapsed between this date and the settlement date. This adjustment was equal to the earned interest and changes in market values from the effective date through settlement date related to fixed maturity securities from both an asset portfolio within the Company, as well as an asset portfolio within UPARC. This resulted in an embedded derivative carried at market value as of the balance sheet date. The realized loss associated with this embedded derivative is $62 million. The initial net coinsurance premium related to this agreement together with the embedded derivative have been accrued and are included within “Other liabilities” in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Amounts included in the Company’s Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at September 30, 2011 were as follows:
| September 30, 2011 |
||||
| ($ in thousands) | ||||
| Reinsurance recoverables |
$ | 1,474,034 | ||
| Policy loans |
$ | (33,256 | ) | |
| Deferred policy acquisition costs |
$ | (329,655 | ) | |
| Other liabilities (reinsurance payables) |
$ | 1,223,913 | ||
Reinsurance amounts included in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income in the third quarter of 2011 are as follows:
| September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
| Three Months Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||
| Gross premium and policy charges and fee income |
$ | 57,380 | $ | 57,380 | ||||
| Interest credited to policy holder accounts ceded |
$ | 11,746 | $ | 11,746 | ||||
| Policyholders’ benefits ceded |
$ | 32,801 | $ | 32,801 | ||||
| Reinsurance expense allowances, net of capitalization and amortization |
$ | 8,170 | $ | 8,170 | ||||
| Realized capital losses, associated with derivatives |
$ | (61,560 | ) | $(61,560) | ||||
45
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
PARCC
The Company reinsures 90% of the risk under its term life insurance policies, with effective dates prior to January 1, 2010, exclusive of My Term, ROP Term Life issued through its life insurance subsidiary, and those reinsured by PAR III (see below) through an automatic coinsurance agreement with PARCC. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of this agreement. Reinsurance recoverables related to this agreement were $2,018 million and $1,826 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Premiums ceded to PARCC in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $184 million and $194 million, respectively; and $549 million and $592 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Benefits ceded to PARCC in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $80 million and $97 million, respectively; and $284 million and $249 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Reinsurance expense allowances, net of capitalization and amortization in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $37 million and $41 million, respectively; and $106 million and $127 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
PAR TERM
The Company reinsures 95% of the risk under its term life insurance policies with effective dates on or after January 1, 2010, exclusive of My Term, through an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR TERM. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of this agreement. Reinsurance recoverables related to this agreement were $202 million and $91 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Premiums ceded to PAR TERM in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $63 million and $31 million, respectively; and $172 million and $67 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Benefits ceded to PAR TERM in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $11 million and $3 million, respectively; and $22 million and $10 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Reinsurance expense allowances, net of capitalization and amortization were $13 million and $8 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively; and $30 million and $16 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
PAR III
The Company, excluding PLNJ, reinsures 90% of the risk under its ROP term life insurance policies with effective dates in 2009 through an automatic coinsurance agreement with PAR III. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of this agreement. Reinsurance recoverables related to this agreement were $6 million and $5 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Premiums ceded to PAR III were less than $1 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, and $2 million and $3 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Benefits ceded to PAR III were less than $1 million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, and in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Reinsurance expense allowances, net of capitalization and amortization in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, and in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010 were less than $1 million.
Prudential Insurance
The Company has a yearly renewable term reinsurance agreement with Prudential Insurance and reinsures the majority of all mortality risks not otherwise reinsured. Effective July 1, 2011, the Company recaptured the portion of this reinsurance agreement related to its universal plus policies having effective dates prior to January 1, 2011. The Company now reinsures these risks with PAR U discussed above. September 30, 2011 amounts include the impact of the recapture. Reinsurance recoverables related to this agreement were $185 million and $175 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Premiums and fees ceded to Prudential Insurance in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $47 million and $59 million, respectively; and $162 million and $174 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Benefits ceded to Prudential in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were $64 million and $76 million, respectively; and $180 and $215 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholder as a result of these agreements.
The Company has reinsured a group annuity contract with Prudential Insurance, in consideration for a single premium payment by the Company, providing reinsurance equal to 100% of all payments due under the contract. The Company is not relieved of its primary obligation to the policyholders as a result of this agreement. Reinsurance recoverables related to this agreement were $7 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Benefits ceded in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 were less than $1 million; and $1 million and in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010.
In December 2010, the Company amended certain of its affiliated reinsurance treaties to change the settlement mode from monthly to annual. As a result of these treaty amendments, the Company was required to pay our reinsurers, Prudential Insurance and UPARC, the premium difference that resulted. Settlement of this premium difference was made by transfers of securities at fair value of $120 million to Prudential Insurance, and $35 million to UPARC.
Pruco Reinsurance
The Company uses reinsurance as part of its risk management and capital management strategies for certain of its optional living benefit features.
46
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
The following table provides information relating to fees ceded to Pruco Reinsurance (“Pruco Re”) under these agreements which are included in “Realized investment (losses) gains, net” on the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the dates indicated.
| Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
| Pruco Reinsurance |
||||||||||||||||
| Effective January 24, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Lifetime Income (“HDI”) |
$ | 7,248 | $ | — | $ | 9,582 | $ | — | ||||||||
| Spousal Highest Daily Lifetime Income (“SHDI”) |
2,936 | — | 3,862 | — | ||||||||||||
| Effective beginning August 24, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Lifetime 6 Plus (“HD6 Plus”) |
29,561 | 7,786 | 81,936 | 12,246 | ||||||||||||
| Spousal Highest Daily Lifetime 6 Plus (“SHD6”) |
14,194 | 3,507 | 38,815 | 5,480 | ||||||||||||
| Effective June 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Lifetime 7 Plus (“HD7 Plus”) |
4,249 | 3,727 | 12,672 | 10,662 | ||||||||||||
| Spousal Highest Daily Lifetime 7 Plus (“SHD7 Plus”) |
2,248 | 1,939 | 6,653 | 5,508 | ||||||||||||
| Effective January 28, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Lifetime 7 (“HD7”) |
2,771 | 2,610 | 8,221 | 7,700 | ||||||||||||
| Spousal Highest Daily Lifetime 7 (“SHD7”) |
670 | 628 | 1,984 | 1,843 | ||||||||||||
| Effective March 15, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
| Guaranteed Return Option Plus II (“GRO Plus II”) |
952 | 313 | 2,670 | 313 | ||||||||||||
| Effective January 28, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Guaranteed Return Option (“ HD GRO”) |
153 | 154 | 457 | 453 | ||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Guaranteed Return Option II (“HD GRO II” ) |
758 | 369 | 2,145 | 367 | ||||||||||||
| Effective Since 2006 |
||||||||||||||||
| Highest Daily Lifetime Five (“HDLT5”) |
1,160 | 1,191 | 3,550 | 3,596 | ||||||||||||
| Spousal Lifetime Five (“SLT5”) |
588 | 561 | 1,834 | 1,702 | ||||||||||||
| Effective Since 2005 |
||||||||||||||||
| Lifetime Five (“LT5”) |
3,779 | 3,657 | 11,841 | 11,129 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Total Pruco Reinsurance |
$ | 71,267 | $ | 26,442 | $ | 186,221 | $ | 60,999 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
The Company’s reinsurance recoverables related to the above product reinsurance agreements were $886 million and ($373) million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Realized gains (losses) ceded were $1,312 million and ($56) million in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized gains (losses) were $1,073 million and $110 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Changes in realized gains (losses) for the 2011 and 2010 periods were primarily due to changes in market conditions in the period. The underlying asset as of September 30, 2011 and the contra-asset as of December 31, 2010 are reflected in “Reinsurance recoverables” in the Company’s Unaudited Interim Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.
Taiwan branch reinsurance agreement
On January 31, 2001, the Company transferred all of its assets and liabilities associated with its Taiwan branch, including its Taiwan insurance book of business, to an affiliate, Prudential Life Insurance Company of Taiwan Inc. (“Prudential of Taiwan”).
The mechanism used to transfer this block of business in Taiwan is referred to as a “full acquisition and assumption” transaction. Under this mechanism, the Company is jointly liable with Prudential of Taiwan for two years from the giving of notice to all obligees for all matured obligations and for two years after the maturity date of not-yet-matured obligations. Prudential of Taiwan is also contractually liable, under indemnification provisions of the transaction, for any liabilities that may be asserted against the Company.
The transfer of the insurance related assets and liabilities was accounted for as a long-duration coinsurance transaction under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Under this accounting treatment, the insurance related liabilities remain on the books of the Company and an offsetting reinsurance recoverable is established. These assets and liabilities are denominated in US dollars.
Affiliated premiums ceded in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 from the Taiwan coinsurance agreement were $18 million and $17 million, respectively; and $53 million and $61 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Affiliated benefits ceded in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 from the Taiwan coinsurance agreement were $5 million and $6 million, respectively; and $16 million and $16 million in the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Reinsurance recoverables related to the Taiwan coinsurance agreement were $958 million and $946 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs Ceded to Term Reinsurance Affiliates
47
Table of Contents
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements—(Continued)
In 2009 when implementing a revision to the reinsurance treaties with PARCC, PAR TERM and PAR III, modifications were made affecting premiums. The related impact on the deferral of ceded reinsurance expense allowance did not reflect this change resulting in the understatement of deferred reinsurance expense allowances. During second quarter 2011, the Company recorded the correction, charging $13 million to net DAC amortization which represented the cumulative impact of this change. These adjustments are not material to any previously reported quarterly or annual financial statements.
Affiliated Asset Transfers
During 2010, the Company purchased fixed maturity securities from affiliated companies, Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation (“PALAC”) and Pruco Re. The investments consisted of public bonds. The securities were purchased from PALAC, at a fair value of $291.9 million, and were recorded net of OCI at an amortized cost of $256.4 million. The securities were purchased from Pruco Re, at a fair value of $81.0 million, and were recorded net of OCI at an amortized cost of $76.3 million. The difference between fair market value and book value of these transfers was accounted for as a net decrease of $40 million to additional paid-in capital in 2010. During first quarter 2011, the Company recorded an out of period adjustment that reclassified the $40 million difference between book value and market value from additional paid-in capital to retained earnings. As part of this adjustment, a $14 million reduction to the deferred tax liability was recorded with an offset also reflected in retained earnings to record the tax effect of this activity. These adjustments were not material to any previously reported quarterly or annual financial statements.
Debt Agreements
The Company has an agreement with an affiliate, Prudential Funding, LLC, which allows the Company to borrow funds for working capital and liquidity needs. The borrowings under this agreement are limited to $1.4 billion. The Company had $50 million in short term debt as of September 30, 2011, and no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
On December 20, 2010, the Company borrowed $650 million from Prudential Insurance. This loan has a fixed interest rate of 3.47% and matures on December 21, 2015. The total related interest expense to the Company was $5.6 million and $16.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
On November 15, 2010 the Company borrowed $245 million from Prudential Financial. This loan has a fixed interest rate of 3.01% and matures on November 13, 2015. The total related interest expense to the Company was $1.8 million and $5.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
On June 20, 2011, the Company entered into a series of four $50 million borrowings with Prudential Financial, totaling $200 million. The loans have fixed interest rates ranging from 1.66% to 3.17% and maturity dates staggered one year apart, from June 19, 2013 to June 19, 2016. The total related interest expense was $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
Derivative Trades
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative contracts with an affiliate, Prudential Global Funding, LLC. For these OTC derivative contracts, Prudential Global Funding, LLC has a substantially equal and offsetting position with external counterparties.
48
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Pruco Life Insurance Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) on Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form in reduced disclosure format.
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A,”) addresses the financial condition of Pruco Life Insurance Company, or the “Company,” as of September 30, 2011, compared with December 31, 2010, and its consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. You should read the following analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the MD&A, the “Risk Factors” section, the statements under “Forward-Looking Statements” and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as well as the statements under “Forward-Looking Statements” and the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
The Company sells variable annuities, term life insurance, universal life insurance, and variable life insurance primarily through third party distributors in the United States. These markets are subject to regulatory oversight with particular emphasis placed on company solvency and sales practices. These markets are also subject to increasing competitive pressure, as the legal barriers that have historically segregated the markets of the financial services industry have been changed. Regulatory changes have opened the insurance industry to competition from other financial institutions, particularly banks and mutual funds that are positioned to deliver competing investment products through large, stable distribution channels. The Company also had marketed individual life insurance through its branch office in Taiwan. All insurance activity of the Taiwan branch has been ceded to an affiliate and the related assets and liabilities continue to be reflected in the Company’s statements of financial position.
Products
Variable and Fixed Annuities
The Company offers a wide array of annuities, including deferred variable annuities that are registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which may include (1) fixed interest rate allocation options, subject to a market value adjustment, and (2) fixed rate allocation options not subject to a market value adjustment and not registered with the SEC.
As a result of the launch of the Company’s new product line in March 2010, an affiliated company, the Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation, ceased selling variable annuity products. In general, the new product line offers the same optional living benefits and optional death benefits as offered by the Company’s existing variable annuities.
The Company offers variable annuities that provide our customers with tax-deferred asset accumulation together with a base death benefit and a suite of optional guaranteed death and living benefits. The benefit features contractually guarantee the contractholder a return of no less than (1) total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals (“return of net deposits”), (2) total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals plus a minimum return (“minimum return”), and/or (3) the highest contract value on a specified date minus any withdrawals (“contract” value). These guarantees may include benefits that are payable in the event of death, annuitization or at specified dates during the accumulation period and withdrawal and income benefits payable during specified periods. Our latest optional living benefits guarantee features the ability to make withdrawals based on the highest daily contract value plus a minimum return, credited for a period of time. This highest daily guaranteed contract value is accessible through periodic withdrawals for the life of the contractholder, and not as a lump-sum surrender value.
Our variable annuity investment options provide our customers with the opportunity to invest in proprietary and non-proprietary mutual funds, frequently under asset allocation programs, and fixed-rate accounts. The investments made by customers in the proprietary and non-proprietary mutual funds generally represent separate account interests that provide a return linked to an underlying investment portfolio. The general account investments made in the fixed rate accounts are credited with interest at rates we determine, subject to certain minimums. We also offer fixed annuities that provide a guarantee of principal and interest credited at rates we determine, subject to certain contractual minimums. Certain investments made in the fixed-rate accounts of our variable annuities and certain fixed annuities impose a market value adjustment if the invested amount is not held to maturity. Based on the contractual terms, the market value adjustment can be positive, resulting in an additional amount for the contractholder, or negative, resulting in a deduction from the contractholder’s account value or redemption proceeds.
The primary risk exposures of our variable annuity contracts relate to actual deviations from, or changes to, the assumptions used in the original pricing of these products, including equity market returns, interest rates, market volatility, timing of annuitization and withdrawals, contract lapses and contractholder mortality. The rate of return we realize from our variable annuity contracts will vary based on the extent of the differences between our actual experience and the assumptions used in the original pricing of these products. As part of our risk management strategy we hedge or limit our exposure to certain of these risks primarily through a combination of product design elements, such as an asset transfer feature, externally purchased hedging instruments and affiliated reinsurance arrangements with Pruco Reinsurance, Ltd. (“Pruco Re”). Our returns can also vary by contract based on our risk management strategy, including the impact of any capital markets movements that we may hedge in Pruco Re, the impact on that portion of our variable annuity contracts that benefit from the asset transfer feature and the impact of risks that are not able to be hedged.
The asset transfer feature, included in the design of certain optional living benefits, transfers assets between the variable investments selected by the annuity contractholder and, depending on the benefit feature, a fixed rate account in the general account or a bond portfolio within the separate account. The asset transfer feature associated with currently-sold benefit features transfers assets between the variable investments selected by the
49
Table of Contents
annuity contractholder and the bond portfolio within the separate account. The transfers are based on the static mathematical formula used with the particular optional benefit which considers a number of factors, including the impact of investment performance on the contractholders’ total account value. In general, negative investment performance may result in transfers to either a fixed rate account in the general account or a bond portfolio within the separate account, and positive investment performance may result in transfers back to contractholder-selected investments. Overall, the asset transfer feature is designed to help mitigate our exposure, and the exposure of the contractholders’ account value, to equity market risk and market volatility. Our asset transfer feature occurs at the contractholder level, rather than the fund level, which we believe enhances our risk management capabilities. Beginning in 2009, our offerings of optional living benefit features associated with currently-sold variable annuity products all include an asset transfer feature, and in 2009 we discontinued any new sales of optional living benefit features without an asset transfer feature. Other product design elements we utilize for certain products to manage these risks include asset allocation restrictions and minimum issuance age requirements. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $38.9 billion or 85% of total variable annuity account values contain a living benefit feature, compared to approximately $29.1 billion or 80% as of December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, approximately $34.7 billion or 89% of variable annuity account values with living benefit features included an asset transfer feature in the product design, compared to approximately $24.2 billion or 83% as of December 31, 2010. The increase in account values with living benefits and the asset transfer feature reflects the impact of new business sales in the first nine months of 2011 and market appreciation.
As mentioned above, in addition to our asset transfer feature, we also manage certain risks associated with our variable annuity products through hedging programs and affiliated reinsurance arrangements. Primarily in the reinsurance affiliate, interest rate swaps, swaptions, floors and caps as well as equity options and futures are purchased to hedge certain living benefit features accounted for as embedded derivatives against changes in interest rates, equity markets and market volatility. Prior to the third quarter of 2010, the hedging strategy sought to generally match the sensitivities of the embedded derivative liability as defined by GAAP, excluding the impact of the market-perceived risk of non-performance, with capital market derivatives. In the third quarter of 2010, the hedging strategy was revised as, in a low interest rate environment, management of the Company and the reinsurance affiliate did not believe the GAAP value of the embedded derivative liability is an appropriate measure for determining the hedge target. The new hedge target is grounded in a GAAP/capital markets valuation framework but incorporates two modifications to the GAAP valuation assumptions. A credit spread is added to the GAAP risk-free rate of return assumption used to estimate future growth of bond investments in the customer separate account funds to account for the fact that the underlying customer separate account funds which support these living benefits are invested in assets that contain risk. The volatility assumption is also adjusted to remove certain risk margins embedded in the valuation technique used to fair value the embedded derivative liability under GAAP, as we believe the increase in the liability driven by these margins is temporary and does reflect the economic value of the liability. The hedging strategy results in differences each period between the change in the value of the embedded derivative liability as defined by GAAP and the change in the value of the hedge positions, potentially increasing volatility in GAAP earnings in the Company and the reinsurance affiliate, and increasing volatility in the amortization of deferred acquisition and other costs of the Company as a result of the gross profits impact. Hedge levels are evaluated versus the target given the overall capital considerations of our ultimate parent Company, Prudential Financial Inc. and its subsidiaries, and prevailing capital market conditions. The Company and the reinsurance affiliate may decide to temporarily hedge to an amount that differs from the hedge target definition based on these considerations.
In the second quarter of 2009, we began the expansion of the Company’s hedging program to include a portion of the market exposure related to the overall capital position of our variable annuity business, including the impact of certain statutory reserve exposures. These capital hedges primarily consisted of equity-based total return swaps that were designed to partially offset changes in our capital position resulting from market driven changes in certain living and death benefit features of our variable annuity products. During the second quarter of 2010, we terminated the capital hedge program in lieu of a new program managed at the Prudential Financial parent company level that more broadly addresses equity market exposure of the overall statutory capital of Prudential Financial as a whole, under stress scenarios. The program focuses on tail risk in order to protect statutory capital in a cost-effective manner under stress scenarios. Prudential Financial assesses the composition of the hedging program on an ongoing basis and may change it from time to time based on an evaluation of its risk position or other factors.
Term Life Insurance
The Company offers a variety of term life insurance products (Term Elite, Term Essential, My Term and ROP Term) which represent 64% of our net individual life insurance in force at September 30, 2011, that provide coverage for a specified time period. These term products, excluding My Term, include a conversion feature that allows the policyholder to convert the policy into permanent life insurance coverage. The ROP Term product offered by the Company offers term life insurance that provides for a return of premium if the insured is alive at the end of the level premium period. There continues to be significant demand for term life insurance protection.
The Company’s profits from term insurance are not expected to directly correlate, from a timing perspective, with the increase in term insurance in force. This results from uneven product profitability patterns.
Variable Life Insurance
The Company offers a number of individual variable life insurance products which represent 25% of our net individual life insurance in force at September 30, 2011. Variable products provide a return linked to an underlying investment portfolio selected by the policyholder while providing the policyholder with the flexibility to change both the death benefit and premium payments. The policyholder generally has the option of investing premiums in a fixed rate option that is part of our general account and /or investing in separate account investment options consisting of equity and fixed income funds. Funds invested in the fixed rate option will accrue interest at rates we determine that vary periodically based on our portfolio rate. In the separate accounts, the policyholder bears the fund performance risk. Each product provides for the deduction of charges and expenses from the customer’s contract fund. The Company also offers a variable product that has the same basic features as our variable universal life product but also allows for a more flexible guarantee against lapse where policyholders can select the guarantee period. In the affluent market, we offer a
50
Table of Contents
private placement variable universal life product, which also utilizes investment options consisting of equity and fixed income funds. While variable life insurance continues to be an important product, marketplace demand continues to favor term and universal life insurance.
A significant portion of the Company’s insurance profits are associated with our large in force block of variable policies. Profit patterns on these policies are not level and as the policies age, insureds generally begin paying reduced policy charges. This, coupled with net policy count and insurance in force runoff over time, reduces our expected future profits from this product line. Asset management fees and mortality and expense fees are a key component of variable life product profitability and vary based on the average daily net asset value. Due to policyholder options under some of the variable life contracts, lapses driven by periods of unfavorable equity market performance may occur on a quarter lag with the market risk during this period being borne by the Company.
Universal Life Insurance
The Company offers universal life insurance products which represent 11% of our net individual life insurance in force at September 30, 2011. Universal life insurance products feature a fixed crediting rate that varies periodically based on portfolio returns, subject to certain minimums, flexible premiums and a choice of guarantees against lapse. Universal life policies provide for the deduction of charges and expenses from the policyholders’ contract fund.
The Company’s profits from universal life insurance are impacted by mortality and expense margins, interest spread on policyholder funds as well as the net interest spread on capital management activities related to a portion of the statutory reserves associated with these products.
Across all of our life insurance products we offer a living benefits option that allows the policy owner to receive a portion of the life insurance benefit if the insured is diagnosed with a terminal illness, or permanently confined to a nursing home, in advance of death of the insured, to use as needed. The remaining death benefit will be paid to the beneficiary upon the death of the insured. We also have a variety of settlement and payment options for the settlement of life insurance claims in addition to lump sum checks, including placing benefits in retained asset accounts, which earn interest and are subject to withdrawal in whole or in part at any time by the beneficiaries.
| 1. | Changes in Financial Position |
September 30, 2011 versus December 31, 2010
Total assets increased $11.625 billion, from $59.472 billion at December 31, 2010 to $71.097 billion at September 30, 2011. Separate account assets increased $8.860 billion, from $43.269 billion at December 31, 2010 to $52.129 billion at September 30, 2011, primarily driven by positive net flows from new business sales, partially offset by account value declines from net unfavorable equity markets.
Reinsurance recoverables increased by $3.030 billion from $2.727 billion at December 31, 2010 to $5.757 billion at September 30, 2011 driven by an increase in ceded reserves for a coinsurance transaction associated with Prudential Arizona Reinsurance Universal Company or “PAR U” and continued growth in the reinsured term life in force. See Note 7 for further detail on these reinsurance transactions. Also driving this increase was the mark-to-market increase in the reinsurance recoverable related to the reinsured liability for variable annuity living benefit embedded derivatives primarily resulting from an increase in the present value of future expected benefit payments primarily driven by unfavorable market conditions.
Deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) decreased by $403 million from $3.378 billion at December 31, 2010, to $2.975 billion at September 30, 2011. The decrease is driven by the DAC balances ceded to PAR U as part of the coinsurance transaction described above and the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for annuity living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions, partially offset by capitalization of commissions related to new business.
Total liabilities increased by $11.896 billion, from $56.146 billion at December 31, 2010 to $68.042 billion at September 30, 2011, primarily due to an increase in separate account liabilities of $8.860 billion, offsetting the increase in separate account assets described above. Future policy benefits and other policyholder liabilities increased by $1.930 billion, from $3.328 billion at December 31, 2010 to $5.258 billion at September 30, 2011, primarily driven by an increase in the liability for living benefit embedded derivatives, as described above, and continued growth in universal life in force. Other liabilities increased $940 million from $475 million at December 31, 2010 to $1.415 billion at September 30, 2011 primarily driven by accrued settlements related to the PARU coinsurance transaction discussed above.
Results of Operations
September 2011 to September 2010 Three Months Comparison
| Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
| Operating results: |
||||||||
| Revenues: |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
$ | 201,965 | $ | 174,688 | ||||
51
Table of Contents
| Life Products and Other |
437,167 | 139,323 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 639,132 | 314,011 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
1,331,593 | (89,341 | ) | |||||
| Life Products and Other |
88,089 | 12,230 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 1,419,682 | (77,111 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Income from Operations before Income Taxes: |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
(1,129,628 | ) | 264,029 | |||||
| Life Products and Other |
349,078 | 127,093 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | (780,550 | ) | $ | 391,122 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity Products
Income from Operations before Income Taxes
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Income/(loss) from operations before income taxes decreased $1,394 million from income of $264 million in the third quarter of 2010 to a loss of $1,130 million in the third quarter of 2011. The decrease was primarily driven by higher amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) and deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) primarily related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions, as discussed in more detail below. Also contributing to the decrease was an unfavorable variance related to adjustments to the amortization of DAC and DSI, and in the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death (“GMDB”) and income benefit (“GMIB”) features of our variable annuity products, to reflect the impact of current period market performance and experience, as well as the impact of the annual review and update of the assumptions on the estimated profitability of our business. Results for both periods include the impact of these items which are discussed in more detail below.
Excluding the higher amortization of DAC/DSI and higher GMDB/GMIB reserve impacts noted above, income (loss) from operations before income taxes was relatively flat period over period. Fee income, net of higher distribution costs, increased due to higher average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts. The increase in separate account balances was primarily due to positive net flows from new business sales, and net market appreciation. The primary drivers offsetting this increase were net mark-to-market losses in the third quarter of 2011 related to the embedded derivatives associated with our non-reinsured living benefit features and related hedges due to unfavorable markets. Also offsetting this increase were higher general and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, primarily due to higher costs to support business growth and higher asset based trail commissions due to higher average variable annuity asset balances as discussed above.
We amortize DAC and DSI over the expected lives of the contracts based on the level and timing of gross profits on the underlying Annuity products. In calculating gross profits, we consider mortality, persistency, and other elements as well as rates of return on investments associated with these contracts and include profits and losses related to these contracts that are reported in affiliated legal entities other than the Company as a result of, for example, reinsurance agreements with those affiliated entities. The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. (an SEC registrant) and has extensive transactions and relationships with other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial, Inc. including reinsurance agreements, as discussed in Note 8 to the Unaudited Interim Financial Statements. Incorporating all product-related profits and losses in gross profits, including those that are reported in affiliated legal entities, produces an amortization pattern representative of the economics of the products.
As mentioned above, included in the unfavorable variance from higher amortization of DAC and DSI, was $1,027 million of higher amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions. This impact primarily relates to changes in the valuation of the reinsured living benefit liabilities related to NPR and other differences between the valuation of the living benefit embedded derivative liability as defined by GAAP and the valuation of the hedge target liability, which we and the reinsurance affiliate believe to be non-economic, and choose not to hedge, as discussed above.
To reflect the NPR of our affiliates in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities, we incorporate an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuation. In the third quarter of both 2010 and 2011, positive NPR adjustments in the reinsurance affiliate were primarily driven by a higher base of embedded derivative liabilities. Significant declines in risk-free interest rates and the impact of equity market declines on account values drove increases in the embedded derivative liability base in the third quarter of 2011, while reductions in the expected lapse rate assumption drove the increases in the third quarter of 2010. Additionally, the spreads used in valuing NPR widened in the third quarter of 2011, contributing to the increase in the adjustment, while a tightening of these spreads partially offset the increase in the third quarter of 2010. The NPR gains in the reinsurance affiliate were larger in the third quarter of 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 resulting in an unfavorable variance from higher amortization of DAC and DSI.
As shown in the following table, income from operations for the third quarter of 2011 included $195 million of charges related to adjustments to DAC and DSI amortization and the GMDB and GMIB reserves of our variable annuity products, compared to $136 million of benefits included in the third quarter of 2010, resulting in a $331 million unfavorable variance.
52
Table of Contents
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of DAC and DSI (1) |
Reserves for GMDB / GMIB (2) |
Total | Amortization of DAC and DSI (1) |
Reserves for GMDB / GMIB (2) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quarterly market performance adjustments |
$ | (67,510 | ) | $ | (94,980 | ) | $ | (162,489 | ) | $ | 22,854 | $ | 39,474 | $ | 62,328 | |||||||||
| Annual review / assumption updates |
(17,410 | ) | 13,541 | (3,869 | ) | 47,229 | 4,354 | 51,583 | ||||||||||||||||
| Quarterly adjustments for current period experience and other updates (3) |
(25,772 | ) | (2,607 | ) | (28,378 | ) | 9,717 | 12,801 | 22,518 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | (110,692 | ) | $ | (84,046 | ) | $ | (194,736 | ) | $ | 79,800 | $ | 56,629 | $ | 136,429 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts reflect (charges) or benefits for (increases) or decreases, respectively, in the amortization of DAC, and DSI. |
| (2) | Amounts reflect (charges) or benefits for reserve (increases) or decreases, respectively, related to the GMDB / GMIB, features of our variable annuity products. |
| (3) | Represents the impact of differences between actual gross profits for the period and the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period, as well as updates for current and future expected claims costs associated with the GMDB/GMIB features of our variable annuity products. |
As shown in the table above, results for both periods include quarterly updates for the impact of fund performance on our DAC/DSI amortization and GMDB/GMIB reserves for our variable annuity products. Results for the third quarter of 2011 included $162 million of charges associated with these quarterly updates due to less favorable than expected market performance. The actual rates of return on annuity account values for the third quarter of 2011 was (10.2%) compared to our expected rate of return of 1.9%. The third quarter of 2010 updates resulted in benefits of $62 million due to favorable market performance. The actual rate of return on annuity account values for the third quarter of 2010 was 7.7% compared to our previously expected rate of return of 2.1%.
We derive our near-term future rate of return assumptions using a reversion to the mean approach, a common industry practice. Under this approach, we consider actual returns over a period of time and initially adjust future projected returns over the next four year period (“the “near-term”) so that the assets are projected to grow at the long-term expected rate of return for the entire period. The near-term future projected return across all contract groups is 9.5% per annum as of September 30, 2011, or approximately 2.3% per quarter, and includes the impact of those contract groups whose near-term future projected returns are based on our near-term blended maximum future rate of return assumptions, as discussed below.
Due to the market decline in the third quarter of 2011, for the majority of contract groups, the projected near-term future annual rate of return calculated using the reversion to the mean approach is greater than our maximum future rate of return assumption across all asset types for this business as of September 30, 2011. In those cases, we utilize the maximum future rate of return over the four year period, thereby limiting the impact of the reversion to the mean on our estimate of total gross profits. The near-term blended maximum future rate of return, for these impacted contract groups, under the reversion to the mean approach is 9.9% at September 30, 2011. Included in the blended maximum future rate are assumptions for returns on various asset classes, including a 4.5% annual weighted average rate of return on fixed income investments and a 13% annual maximum rate of return on equity investments.
As discussed and shown in the table above, results for both periods include the impact of the annual reviews performed in the third quarter of the assumptions used in the reserves for the GMDB and GMIB features of our variable annuity products and in our estimate of total gross profits used as a basis for amortizing DAC and other costs. The third quarter of 2011 included $4 million of charges from these annual reviews, primarily related to a reduction of the weighted average future fixed rate of return assumption to 4.5% partially offset by a reduction of the assumption of the percentage of contracts with a GMIB feature that will annuitize based on the guaranteed value. The reduction in the weighted average future fixed rate of return assumption was driven by a refinement to our rate-setting methodology to reflect a lower interest rate assumption for the next five years to reflect current market conditions, and use the long-term assumed rate thereafter in determining the blended future fixed rate of return. The third quarter of 2010 included $52 million of benefits from these annual reviews, primarily related to reductions in lapse rate assumptions and more favorable assumptions relating to fee income.
The $28 million charge in the third quarter of 2011 and the $23 million of benefits in the third quarter of 2010 shown in the table above reflect the quarterly adjustments for current period experience also referred to as an experience true-up adjustments. The experience true-up adjustments for the third quarter of 2011 include an increase in the amortization of DAC/DSI primarily driven by the determination that the difference in the change of the fair value of the hedge target liability and the change in the fair value of the hedge assets in the reinsurance affiliate was other-than-temporary, resulting in its inclusion in our best estimate of total gross profits for setting the amortization rate for DAC and other costs. For additional details on our policy for amortizing DAC and other costs related to the above item and other changes in the valuation of the reinsured living benefit embedded derivatives, refer to the “Accounting Policies and Pronouncements” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2010. The experience true-up adjustments for the third quarter of 2010 include a reduction in the amortization of DAC/DSI driven by higher than expected gross profits primarily from higher than expected fee income. The unfavorable variance related to the adjustment to the GMDB/GMIB reserves was primarily driven by differences in actual lapse experience and contract guarantee claim costs in third quarter of 2010 compared to third quarter of 2011.
As noted previously, the quarterly adjustments to reflect current period market performance and experience, and the annual review and update of assumptions impact the estimated the profitability of our business. Therefore, in addition to the current period impacts discussed above, these items will also drive changes in our GMDB and GMIB reserves and the amortization of DAC/DSI in future periods.
Revenues
53
Table of Contents
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Revenues increased $27 million from $175 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $202 million in the third quarter of 2011.
Policy charges and fee income, consisting primarily of mortality and expense and other insurance charges assessed on policyholders’ fund balances in the separate account, increased $101 million from $104 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $205 million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase was primarily driven by higher average separate account asset balances due to positive net flows from new business sales, and net market appreciation. Asset administration fees increased by $33 million from $18 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $51 million in the third quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher average separate account asset balances, as discussed above.
Net realized investment gains (losses) decreased $105 million from a gain of $10 million in the third quarter of 2010, to a loss of $95 million in the third quarter of 2011, driven by an unfavorable variance due to net mark-to-market losses in the third quarter of 2011 related to the embedded derivatives associated with our non-reinsured living benefit features and related hedges driven by unfavorable market conditions.
Benefits and Expenses
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $1,421 million from a negative expense of $89 million in the third quarter of 2010 to expenses of $1,332 million in the third quarter of 2011.
Amortization of DAC increased by $972 million, from a benefit of $102 million in the third quarter of 2010 to an expense of $870 million in the third quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher DAC amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions and the impact of our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance, as well as our annual assumption update, as discussed above.
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $267 million, from a benefit of $6 million in the third quarter of 2010 to an expense of $261 million in the third quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher DSI amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions and the impact of our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance, as well as our annual assumption update, as discussed above.
Policyholders benefits, including changes in reserves, increased $142 million, from a benefit of $40 million in the third quarter of 2010 to an expense of $102 million in the third quarter of 2011, primarily due to the adjustments to the GMDB and GMIB reserves related to the impact of our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance, as well as our annual assumption update, as discussed above.
General and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, increased $31 million, from $59 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $90 million in the third quarter of 2011, primarily due to higher costs to support business growth and higher distribution expenses driven by higher asset based trail commissions due to higher account values, as discussed above.
Life Products and Other
Income from Operations before Income Taxes
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Income from Operations before Income Taxes increased $222 million from $127 million in the third quarter 2010 to $349 million in the third quarter of 2011. Results for the third quarter of 2011 benefited from lower amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of unearned revenue reserves partially offset by an increase in reserves for the guaranteed minimum death benefit feature in certain contracts, reflecting updates of our actuarial assumptions based on an annual review. The annual reviews update assumptions used in our estimate of total gross profits which forms the basis for amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs and unearned revenue reserves, as well as the reserve for the guaranteed minimum death benefit feature in certain contracts. The third quarter of 2011 included a $17 million benefit from the annual review, primarily reflecting improved mortality assumptions based on experience. The third quarter of 2010 included a $56 million benefit from the annual review, primarily reflecting methodology refinements related to the treatment of certain investment income in our assumptions, as well as improved future mortality expectations.
Excluding these adjustments, Income from Operations before Income Taxes in the third quarter of 2011 increased $261 million driven by a $352 million gain realized on a portion of an embedded derivative recaptured upon modification of the reinsurance agreement of no-lapse guarantees with UPARC, partially offset by a $61 million realized loss related to the embedded derivative arising from the settlement of the coinsurance premiums payable to PAR U. See Note 7 for further detail on these agreements. These were partially offset by higher net DAC amortization reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the third quarter of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions in the third quarter of 2010.
Revenues
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Revenues of $437 million in the third quarter of 2011 increased by $298 million, from $139 million in the third quarter of 2010.
Premiums decreased $2 million from $16 million in third quarter 2010 to $14 million in third quarter 2011. Premiums for term insurance increased $20 million due to consistent growth in term business and were more than offset by premiums ceded of $22 million due to decreased retention resulting from modifications to certain coinsurance treaties with affiliates.
54
Table of Contents
Policy charges and fee income, consisting primarily of mortality and expense loading and other insurance charges assessed on general and separate account policyholders’ fund balances, increased by $9 million including a $4 million increase in unearned revenue reserves due to the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item policy charges and fee income increased $5 million driven by higher amortization of unearned revenue reserves reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the third quarter of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions in the third quarter of 2010.
Net realized investment gains increased $293 million, from a gain of $8 million in the third quarter of 2010 to a gain of $301 million in the third quarter of 2011. The increase is primarily driven by a $352 million gain realized on a portion of an embedded derivative recaptured upon modification of the reinsurance agreement of no-lapse guarantees with UPARC, including a $39 million gain arising from the settlement of this recapture. Partially offsetting this gain was a $61 million realized loss related to the embedded derivative arising from the settlement of the coinsurance premiums payable to PAR U. (See Note 5 in the Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements)
Benefits and Expenses
2011 to 2010 Three Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses of $88 million in the third quarter of 2011 increased by $76 million, from $12 million in the third quarter of 2010.
Policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, increased by $67 million, from $50 million in the third quarter of 2010 to $117 million in the third quarter of 2011. This increase included a $42 million lower benefit from the impacts of the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item, policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $25 million primarily driven by an increase by universal life reserve growth attributable to continued sales and in force growth, a $9 million pre-tax increase in reserves for estimated payments arising from use of new Social Security Master Death File matching criteria to identify deceased policy and contract holders, and a decrease in the change in ceded reserves due to decreased retention resulting from modifications to certain coinsurance treaties with affiliates as well the amendment of certain of our affiliated reinsurance treaties to change settlement modes from monthly to annual.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased by $8 million from a $66 million benefit in the third quarter of 2010 to a $58 million benefit in the third quarter of 2011. This included a $1 million increase from the impacts of the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $7 million reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the third quarter of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the third quarter of 2010.
General and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, increased $3 million from $28 million in third quarter 2010 to $31 million in third quarter 2011 driven by higher operating expenses.
September 2011 to September 2010 Nine Month Comparison
| Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||
| Operating results: |
||||||||
| Revenues: |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
$ | 755,703 | $ | 479,441 | ||||
| Life Products and Other |
856,150 | 555,511 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 1,611,853 | 1,034,952 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Benefits and expenses: |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
1,777,575 | 473,958 | ||||||
| Life Products and Other |
441,033 | 330,593 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| 2,218,608 | 804,551 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Income from Operations before Income Taxes |
||||||||
| Annuity Products |
(1,021,872 | ) | 5,483 | |||||
| Life Products and Other |
415,117 | 224,918 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| $ | (606,755 | ) | $ | 230,401 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Annuity Products
Income from Operations before Income Taxes
55
Table of Contents
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Income from operations before income taxes decreased $1,027 million from income of $5 million in the first nine months of 2010 to a loss of $1,022 million in the first nine months of 2011. The decrease was primarily driven by higher amortization of DAC and DSI primarily related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions, as discussed in more detail below. Also contributing to the decrease was an unfavorable variance related to adjustments to the amortization of DAC and DSI, and in the reserves for the guaranteed minimum death (“GMDB”) and income benefit (“GMIB”) features of our variable annuity products, to reflect the impact of current period market performance and experience, as well as the impact of the annual review and update of the assumptions on the estimated profitability of our business. Results for both periods include the impact of these items which are discussed in more detail below.
Excluding the higher amortization of DAC/DSI and higher GMDB/GMIB reserve impacts noted above, income (loss) from operations before income taxes increased $148 million driven by higher fee income, net of higher distribution costs, due to higher average variable annuity asset balances invested in separate accounts. The increase in separate account balances was primarily due to positive net flows from new business sales, and net market appreciation. Partially offsetting this increase were net mark-to- market losses in 2011 related to the embedded derivatives associated with our non-reinsured living benefit features and related hedges due to unfavorable markets. Also offsetting this increase were higher general, administrative and other expenses, net of capitalization, primarily due to higher costs to support business growth, higher asset based trail commissions due to higher account values as discussed below and increased interest expense related to higher intercompany borrowings to fund costs related to new business sales.
We amortize DAC and DSI over the expected lives of the contracts based on the level and timing of gross profits on the underlying Annuity products. In calculating gross profits, we consider mortality, persistency, and other elements as well as rates of return on investments associated with these contracts and include profits and losses related to these contracts that are reported in affiliated legal entities other than the Company as a result of, for example, reinsurance agreements with those affiliated entities. The Company is an indirect subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc. (an SEC registrant) and has extensive transactions and relationships with other subsidiaries of Prudential Financial, Inc. including reinsurance agreements, as discussed in Note 8 to the Unaudited Interim Financial Statements. Incorporating all product-related profits and losses in gross profits, including those that are reported in affiliated legal entities, produces an amortization pattern representative of the economics of the products.
As mentioned above, included in the unfavorable variance from higher amortization of DAC and DSI, was a $834 million higher amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions. This impact primarily relates changes in the valuation of the reinsured living benefit liabilities related to NPR and other differences between the valuation of the living benefit embedded derivative liability as defined by GAAP and the valuation of the hedge target liability, which we and the reinsurance affiliate believe to be non-economic, and choose not to hedge, as discussed above.
To reflect the NPR of our affiliates in the valuation of the embedded derivative liabilities, we incorporate an additional spread over LIBOR into the discount rate used in the valuation. In the first nine months of both 2010 and 2011, positive NPR adjustments in the reinsurance affiliate, were primarily driven by a higher base of embedded derivative liabilities. Significant declines in risk-free interest rates and the impact of equity market declines on account values drove increases in the embedded derivative liability base in the first nine months of 2011, while adverse changes to capital market inputs and a reduction in the expected lapse rate assumption drove the increase in the first nine months of 2010. Additionally, the spreads used in valuing NPR widened in the first nine months of 2011, which also contributed to the increase in the adjustment. The NPR gains in the reinsurance affiliate were larger in 2011 compared to 2010 resulting in an unfavorable variance from higher amortization of DAC and DSI.
As shown in the following table, income from operations for the first nine months of 2011 included $186 million of charges related to adjustments to amortizing DAC and DSI and the GMDB and GMIB reserves for the guaranteed minimum death and income benefit features of our variable annuity products, compared to $75 million of benefits included in the first nine months of 2010, resulting in a $261 million unfavorable variance.
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of DAC and DSI (1) |
Reserves for GMDB / GMIB (2) |
Total | Amortization of DAC and DSI (1) |
Reserves for GMDB / GMIB (2) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quarterly market performance adjustment |
$ | (69,181 | ) | $ | (91,466 | ) | $ | (160,647 | ) | $ | (3,250 | ) | $ | (9,837 | ) | $ | (13,087 | ) | ||||||
| Annual review / assumption updates |
(17,410 | ) | 13,541 | (3,869 | ) | 47,229 | 4,354 | 51,583 | ||||||||||||||||
| Quarterly adjustment for current period experience and other updates (3) |
(19,685 | ) | (1,501 | ) | (21,186 | ) | 19,627 | 17,137 | 36,764 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | (106,276 | ) | $ | (79,426 | ) | $ | (185,702 | ) | $ | 63,606 | $ | 11,654 | $ | 75,260 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| (1) | Amounts reflect (charges) or benefits for (increases) or decreases, respectively, in the amortization of DAC and DSI. |
| (2) | Amounts reflect (charges) or benefits for reserve (increases) or decreases, respectively, related to the GMDB / GMIB, features of our variable annuity products. |
| (3) | Represents the impact of differences between actual gross profits for the period and the previously estimated expected gross profits for the period, as well as updates for current and future expected claims costs associated with the GMDB/GMIB features of our variable annuity products. |
As shown in the table above, results for both periods include quarterly updates for the impact of fund performance on our DAC/DSI amortization and GMDB/GMIB reserves for our variable annuity products. Results for the first nine months of 2011 included $161 million of charges associated with
56
Table of Contents
these quarterly updates due to overall net unfavorable market performance. Results for the first nine months of 2010 included charges of $13 million due to overall net unfavorable market performance. The following table shows the actual quarterly rates of return on variable annuity account values compared to our previously expected quarterly rates of return used in our estimate of total gross profits for the periods indicated.
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Actual rate of return |
3.4 | % | 0.8 | % | (10.2 | )% | 3.3 | % | (5.9 | )% | 8.0 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expected rate of return |
1.8 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.9 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||
As discussed and shown in the table above, results for both periods include the impact of the annual reviews performed in the third quarter of the assumptions used in the reserves for the GMDB and GMIB features of our variable annuity products and in our estimate of total gross profits used as a basis for amortizing DAC/DSI. The third quarter of 2011 included $4 million of charges from these annual reviews, primarily related to a reduction in the weighted average future fixed rate of return assumption to 4.5% partially offset by a reduction of the assumption of the percentage of contracts with a GMIB feature that will annuitize based on the guaranteed value. The third quarter of 2010 included $52 million of benefits from these annual reviews, primarily related to reductions in lapse rate assumptions and more favorable assumptions relating to fee income.
The $21 million charge in 2011 and the $37 million benefit in 2010 shown in the table above reflect the quarterly adjustments for current period experience, also referred to as experience true-up adjustments. The experience true-up adjustments for the first nine months of 2011 include an increase in the amortization of DAC/DSI primarily driven by the determination that the difference in the change of the fair value of the hedge target liability and the change in the fair value of the hedge assets in the reinsurance affiliate was other-than-temporary, resulting in its inclusion in our best estimate of total gross profits for setting the amortization rate for DAC and other costs. For additional details on our policy for amortizing DAC/DSI related to the above item and other changes in the valuation of the reinsured living benefit embedded derivatives, refer to the “Accounting Policies and Pronouncements” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2010. The experience true-up adjustments for the first nine months of 2010 include a reduction in the amortization of DAC/DSI driven by higher than expected gross profits primarily from higher than expected fee income. The unfavorable variance related to the adjustment to the GMDB/GMIB reserves was primarily driven by differences in actual lapse experience and contract guarantee claims costs in 2011 compared to 2010.
Revenues
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Revenues increased $276 million from $479 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $756 million in the first nine months of 2011.
Policy charges and fee income, consisting primarily of mortality and expense and other insurance charges assessed on policyholders’ fund balances, increased $298 million from $262 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $560 million in the first nine months of 2011. The increase was primarily driven by higher average separate account asset balances due to positive net flows from new business sales and net market appreciation.
Asset administration fees increased by $92 million from $45 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $137 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to higher average separate account asset balances, as discussed above.
Net realized investment gains (losses) decreased $115 million from a benefit of $44 million in 2010, to an expense of $71 million in 2011, driven by an unfavorable variance due to mark-to-market losses in 2011 related to the embedded derivatives associated with our non-reinsured living benefit features and related hedges driven by unfavorable markets.
Benefits and Expenses
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Benefits and expenses increased $1,304 million from $474 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $1,778 million in the first nine months of 2011.
Amortization of DAC increased by $852 million, from $159 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $1,011 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to higher DAC amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions and the impact of our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance as well as the annual assumption update, as discussed above.
Interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $223 million, from $116 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $339 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to higher DSI amortization related to the impact of the mark-to-market of the reinsured liability for living benefit embedded derivatives and related hedge positions and the impact of our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance as well as the annual assumption update, as discussed above.
General administrative and other expenses, net of capitalization, increased $129 million, from $166 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $295 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to higher costs to support business growth, higher distribution expenses driven by higher asset
57
Table of Contents
based trail commissions due to higher account values, as discussed above, and increased interest expense related to higher intercompany borrowings to fund costs related to new business sales.
Policyholders benefits, including changes in reserves, increased $99 million, from $33 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $132 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to the adjustments to the GMDB/ GMIB reserves of our variable annuity products related to our quarterly adjustments to reflect current period experience and market performance as well as our annual assumption update as discussed above.
Life Products and Other
Income from Operations before Income Taxes
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Income from Operations before Income Taxes increased $190 million from $225 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $415 million in the first nine months of 2011. Results for the first nine months of 2011 benefited from lower amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs net of unearned revenue reserves partially offset by an increase in reserves for the guaranteed minimum death benefit feature in certain contracts, reflecting updates of our actuarial assumptions based on an annual review. The annual reviews update assumptions used in our estimate of total gross profits which forms the basis for amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs and unearned revenue reserves, as well as the reserve for the guaranteed minimum death benefit feature in certain contracts. The first nine months of 2011 included a $17 million benefit from the annual review, primarily reflecting improved mortality assumptions based on experience. The first nine months of 2010 included a $56 million benefit from the annual review, primarily reflecting methodology refinements related to the treatment of certain investment income in our assumptions, as well as improved future mortality expectations.
Excluding these adjustments, Income from Operations before Income Taxes in the first nine months of 2011 increased $229 million driven by a $352 million gain realized on a portion of an embedded derivative recaptured upon modification of the reinsurance agreement of no-lapse guarantees with UPARC, partially offset by a $61 million realized loss related to the embedded derivative for the coinsurance premiums payable to PAR U. These were partially offset by higher net DAC amortization reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the first nine months of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions in the first nine months of 2010.
Revenues
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Revenues of $856 million in the first nine months of 2011 increased by $300 million, from $556 million in the first nine months of 2010.
Premiums decreased $8 million from $49 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $41 million in first nine months of 2011. Premiums for term insurance increased $56 million due to consistent growth in term business and were more than offset by reinsurance premiums that increased $64 million due to decreased retention resulting from modifications to certain coinsurance treaties with affiliates.
Policy charges and fee income, consisting primarily of mortality and expense loading and other insurance charges assessed on general and separate account policyholders’ fund balances, increased by $22 million including a $4 million increase in unearned revenue reserves due to the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item policy charges and fee income increased $18 million driven by higher policy charges due to increased sales of universal life products and higher amortization of unearned revenue reserves reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the third quarter of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions in the third quarter of 2010.
Net realized investment gains increased $283 million, from a gain of $22 million in the first nine months of 2010 to a gain of $305 million in the first nine months of 2011. The increase is primarily driven by a $352 million gain realized on a portion of an embedded derivative recaptured upon modification of the reinsurance agreement of no-lapse guarantees with UPARC, including a $39 million gain arising from the settlement of this recapture. Partially offsetting this gain was a $61 million realized loss related to the embedded derivative arising from the settlement of the coinsurance premiums payable to PAR U. (See Note 5 in the Notes to Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements)
Benefits and Expenses
2011 to 2010 Nine Month Comparison. Total benefits and expenses of $441 million in the first nine months of 2011 increased by $110 million, from $331 million in the first nine months of 2010.
Policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances, increased by $66 million, from $217 million in the first nine months of 2010 to $283 million in the first nine months of 2011. This increase included a $42 million lower benefit from the impacts of the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item, policyholders’ benefits, including interest credited to policyholders’ account balances increased $24 million primarily driven by an increase by universal life reserve growth attributable to continued sales and in force growth, a $9 million pre-tax increase in reserves for estimated payments arising from use of new Social Security Master Death File matching criteria to identify deceased policy and contract holders, and a decrease in the change in ceded reserves due to decreased retention resulting from modifications to certain coinsurance treaties with affiliates as well the amendment of certain of our affiliated reinsurance treaties to change settlement modes from monthly to annual.
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased by $32 million from a $33 million benefit in the first nine months of 2010 to a $65 million benefit in the first nine months of 2011. This included a $1 million increase from the impacts of the annual reviews of assumptions. Excluding this item, amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased $31 million reflecting the impact of unfavorable market conditions on
58
Table of Contents
separate account fund performance in the first nine months of 2011 and the impact of favorable market conditions on separate account fund performance in the first nine months of 2010. The increase also includes higher amortization arising from the understatement of deferred reinsurance expense allowances related to affiliated reinsurance of our term business in prior periods.
General and administrative expenses, net of capitalization, increased $15 million from $80 million in first nine months of 2010 to $95 million in first nine months of 2011 driven by higher operating expenses.
Income Taxes
Our income tax provision amounted to a benefit of $275 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to an expense of $41 million in the first nine months of 2010, respectively, or an effective tax rate of 45.3% and 17.8%, respectively. The increase in income tax benefit and change in effective tax rate was primarily driven by a change from pre-tax income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to a pre-tax loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Our income tax provision amounted to a benefit of $311 million and an expense of $114 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, or an effective tax rate of 39.8% and 29.2%, respectively. The increase in income tax benefit and change in effective tax rate was primarily driven by a change from pre-tax income for the three months ended September 30, 2010 to a pre-tax loss for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
The Company’s liability for income taxes includes the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, interest and penalties which relate to tax years still subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or other taxing authorities. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. Generally, for tax years which produce net operating losses, capital losses or tax credit carryforwards (“tax attributes”), the statute of limitations does not close, to the extent of these tax attributes, until the expiration of the statute of limitations for the tax year in which they are fully utilized. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the liability for income taxes. The statute of limitations for the 2002 tax year expired on April 30, 2009. The statute of limitations for the 2003 tax year expired on July 31, 2009. The statute of limitations for the 2004 through 2007 tax years will expire in February 2012, unless extended. Tax years 2008 through 2010 are still open for IRS examination. The Company has commenced settlement discussions with the IRS that could result in the closure of the audit of tax years through 2006. The Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change in the next twelve months. However, due to the nature of the uncertainties, a range of the amount of the potential change cannot be reasonably predicted.
The dividends received deduction (“DRD”) reduces the amount of dividend income subject to U.S. tax and is a significant component of the difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. The DRD for the current period was estimated using information from 2010, current year results, and was adjusted to take into account the current year’s equity market performance. The actual current year DRD can vary from the estimate based on factors such as, but not limited to, changes in the amount of dividends received that are eligible for the DRD, changes in the amount of distributions received from mutual fund investments, changes in the account balances of variable life and annuity contracts, and the Company’s taxable income before the DRD.
In August 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which included, among other items, guidance on the methodology to be followed in calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. In September 2007, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2007-61. Revenue Ruling 2007-61 suspended Revenue Ruling 2007-54 and informed taxpayers that the U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS intend to address through new regulations the issues considered in Revenue Ruling 2007-54, including the methodology to be followed in determining the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. On February 14, 2011, the Obama Administration released the “General Explanations of the Administration’s Revenue Proposals.” Although the Administration has not released proposed statutory language, one proposal would change the method used to determine the amount of the DRD. A change in the DRD, including the possible retroactive or prospective elimination of this deduction through regulation or legislation, could increase actual tax expense and reduce the Company’s consolidated net income. These activities had no impact on the Company’s results in 2010 or the first nine months of 2011.
In December 2006, the IRS completed all fieldwork with respect to its examination of the consolidated federal income tax returns for tax years 2002 and 2003. The final report was initially submitted to the Joint Committee on Taxation for their review in April 2007. The final report was resubmitted in March 2008 and again in April 2008. The Joint Committee returned the report to the IRS for additional review of an industry issue regarding the methodology for calculating the DRD related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The IRS completed its review of the issue and proposed an adjustment with respect to the calculation of the DRD. In order to expedite receipt of an income tax refund related to the 2002 and 2003 tax years, the Company agreed to such adjustment. The report, with the adjustment to the DRD, was submitted to the Joint Committee on Taxation in October 2008. The Company was advised on January 2, 2009 that the Joint Committee completed its consideration of the report and took no exception to the conclusions reached by the IRS. Accordingly, the final report was processed and a $157 million refund was received by the Company’s parent, Prudential Financial, in February 2009. The Company believed that its return position with respect to the calculation of the DRD is technically correct. Therefore, the Company filed protective refund claims on October 1, 2009 to recover the taxes associated with the agreed upon adjustment. The IRS issued an Industry Director Directive (“IDD”) in May 2010 stating that the methodology for calculating the DRD set forth in Revenue Ruling 2007-54 should not be followed. The IDD also confirmed that the IRS guidance issued before Revenue Ruling 2007-54, which guidance the Company relied upon in calculating its DRD, should be used to determine the DRD. The Company’s parent, Prudential Financial, has received a refund of approximately $3 million pursuant to the protective refund claims. These activities had no impact on the Company’s results in 2010 or the first nine months of 2011.
In January 2007, the IRS began an examination of tax years 2004 through 2006. For tax years 2007 through 2010, the Company is participating in the IRS’s Compliance Assurance Program (“CAP”). Under CAP, the IRS assigns an examination team to review completed transactions
59
Table of Contents
contemporaneously during these tax years in order to reach agreement with the Company on how they should be reported in the tax returns. If disagreements arise, accelerated resolutions programs are available to resolve the disagreements in a timely manner before the tax returns are filed. It is management’s expectation this program will shorten the time period between the filing of the Company’s federal income tax returns and the IRS’s completion of its examination of the returns.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Liquidity refers to the ability to generate sufficient cash resources to meet the payment obligations of the Company. Capital refers to the long term financial resources available to support the operation of our businesses, fund business growth, and provide a cushion to withstand adverse circumstances. The ability to generate and maintain sufficient liquidity and capital depends on the profitability of our businesses, general economic conditions and our access to the capital markets through affiliates as described herein.
Management monitors the liquidity of Prudential Financial, Prudential Insurance and the Company on a daily basis and projects borrowing and capital needs over a multi-year time horizon through our quarterly planning process. We believe that cash flows from the sources of funds presently available to us are sufficient to satisfy the current liquidity requirements of Prudential Financial and the Company, including reasonably foreseeable contingencies.
We continue to refine our metrics for capital management. These refinements to the current framework, which is primarily based on statutory risk based capital measures, are designed to more appropriately reflect risks associated with our businesses on a consistent basis across the Company. In addition, we continue to use an economic capital framework for making certain business decisions.
Similar to our planning and management process for liquidity, we use a Capital Protection Framework to ensure the availability of adequate capital under reasonably foreseeable stress scenarios. The Capital Protection Framework is used to assess potential capital needs arising from severe market related distress and sources of capital available to us to meet those needs. Potential sources include on-balance sheet capital, derivatives and other contingent sources of capital.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, signed into law on July 21, 2010, could result in the imposition of new capital, liquidity and other requirements on Prudential Financial and the Company. See “Other Business Regulation” in Part I for information regarding the potential effects of the Dodd-Frank bill on the Company and its affiliates.
General Liquidity
Liquidity refers to a company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet the needs of its operations. Our liquidity is managed to ensure stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of cash flows to meet all of our obligations. Liquidity is provided by a variety of sources, as described more fully below, including portfolios of liquid assets. Our investment portfolios are integral to the overall liquidity of those operations. We segment our investment portfolios and employ an asset/liability management approach specific to the requirements of our product lines. This enhances the discipline applied in managing the liquidity, as well as the interest rate and credit risk profiles, of each portfolio in a manner consistent with the unique characteristics of the product liabilities. We use a projection process for cash flows from operations to ensure sufficient liquidity to meet projected cash outflows, including claims. The impact of Prudential Funding, LLC’s financing capacity on liquidity (as described below) is considered in the internal liquidity measures of the Company.
Liquidity is measured against internally developed benchmarks that take into account the characteristics of both the asset portfolio and the liabilities that they support. The results are affected substantially by the overall asset type and quality of our investments.
Cash Flow
The principal sources of the Company’s liquidity are premiums and certain annuity considerations, investment and fee income, and investment maturities. assets, as well as internal borrowings. The principal uses of that liquidity include benefits, claims, dividends paid to policyholders, and payments to policyholders and contractholders in connection with surrenders, withdrawals and net policy loan activity. Other uses of liquidity include commissions, general and administrative expenses, purchases of investments, and payments in connection with financing activities. As a result of the launch of its new annuity product line in March 2010, as discussed above, the Company has seen and expects to continue to see the overall level of these activities to increase.
We believe that the cash flows from our insurance and annuity operations are adequate to satisfy our current liquidity requirements, including under reasonably foreseeable stress scenarios. The continued adequacy of this liquidity will depend upon factors such as future securities market conditions, changes in interest rate levels, customer behavior, policyholder perceptions of our financial strength, and the relative safety of competing products, each of which could lead to reduced cash inflows or increased cash outflows. In addition, market volatility can impact the level of capital required to support our businesses, particularly in our annuity products. Our cash flows from investment activities result from repayments of principal, proceeds
60
Table of Contents
from maturities and sales of invested assets and investment income, net of amounts reinvested. The primary liquidity risks with respect to these cash flows are the risk of default by debtors or bond insurers, our counterparties’ willingness to extend repurchase and/or securities lending arrangements, commitments to invest and market volatility. We closely manage these risks through our credit risk management process and regular monitoring of our liquidity position. Further, the level of new business sales can also impact liquidity, and additional financing may be required due to the increase in annuity sales as previously discussed.
In managing our liquidity, we also consider the risk of policyholder and contractholder withdrawals of funds earlier than our assumptions when selecting assets to support these contractual obligations. We use surrender charges and other contract provisions to mitigate the extent, timing and profitability impact of withdrawals of funds by customers from annuity contracts and deposit liabilities.
Individual life insurance policies are less susceptible to withdrawal than our annuity reserves and deposit liabilities because policyholders may be subject to a new underwriting process in order to obtain a new insurance policy. Our annuity reserves with guarantee features may be less susceptible to withdrawal than historical experience indicates, due to the current value of these guarantee features to policyholders as a result of recent market declines.
Gross account withdrawals amounted to approximately $1.9 billion and $1.5 billion in the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Because these withdrawals were consistent with our assumptions in asset/liability management, the associated cash outflows did not have a material adverse impact on our overall liquidity.
Liquid Assets
Liquid assets include cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments, fixed maturities and public equity securities. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company had liquid assets of $6.728 billion and $6.674 billion, respectively. The portion of liquid assets comprised of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments was $637 million and $612 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. As of September 30, 2011, $5.624 billion, or 92%, of the fixed maturity investments company general account portfolios were rated investment grade. The remaining $459 million, or 8%, of these fixed maturity investments were rated non-investment grade. We consider attributes of the various categories of liquid assets (for example, type of asset and credit quality) in calculating internal liquidity measures in order to evaluate the adequacy of our insurance operations’ liquidity under a variety of stress scenarios. We believe that the liquidity profile of our assets is sufficient to satisfy current liquidity requirements, including under foreseeable stress scenarios.
Given the size and liquidity profile of our investment portfolios, we believe that claims experience varying from our projections does not constitute a significant liquidity risk. Our asset/liability management process takes into account the expected maturity of investments and expected claim payments as well as the specific nature and risk profile of the liabilities. Historically, there has been no significant variation between the expected maturities of our investments and the payment of claims.
Our liquidity is managed through access to substantial investment portfolios as well as a variety of instruments available for funding and/or managing short-term cash flow mismatches, including from time to time those arising from claim levels in excess of projections. To the extent we need to pay claims in excess of projections, we may borrow temporarily or sell investments sooner than anticipated to pay these claims, which may result in increased borrowing costs or realized investment gains or losses affecting results of operations. We believe that borrowing temporarily or selling investments earlier than anticipated will not have a material impact on the liquidity of the Company. Payment of claims and sale of investments earlier than anticipated would have an impact on the reported level of cash flow from operating and investing activities, respectively, in our financial statements.
Prudential Funding, LLC
Prudential Funding, LLC, or Prudential Funding, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Insurance, serves as an additional source of financing to meet our working capital needs. Prudential Funding operates under a support agreement with Prudential Insurance whereby Prudential Insurance has agreed to maintain Prudential Funding positive tangible net worth at all times. Prudential Funding borrows funds in the capital markets primarily through the direct issuance of commercial paper.
Capital
The Risk Based Capital, or RBC, ratio is a primary measure by which we evaluate the capital adequacy of the Company. Prudential Financial manages its domestic insurance subsidiaries RBC ratios to a level that is consistent with the ratings targets for those subsidiaries and in excess of the minimum levels required by applicable insurance regulations. RBC is determined by statutory formulas that consider risks related to the type and quality of the invested assets, insurance-related risks associated with an insurer’s products, interest rate risks and general business risks. The RBC ratio calculations are intended to assist insurance regulators in measuring the adequacy of an insurer’s statutory capitalization. The RBC ratio is an annual calculation; however, based upon September 30, 2011 amounts, management of the Company and Prudential Financial, Inc. estimate that the RBC ratios for the Company, would exceed the minimum level required by applicable insurance regulations.
61
Table of Contents
The level of statutory capital of the Company can be materially impacted by interest rate and equity market fluctuations, changes in the values of derivatives, the level of impairments recorded, credit quality migration of investment portfolio, among other items. Further, the recapture of business subject to reinsurance arrangements due to defaults by, or credit quality migration affecting, the reinsurers could result in higher required statutory capital levels. The level of statutory capital of the Company is also affected by statutory accounting rules which are subject to change by insurance regulators.
During 2010, as part of its Capital Protection Framework, Prudential Financial developed a broad view of the impact of market distress on the statutory capital of Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries, as a whole. In the second quarter of 2010, the capital hedge program was terminated as described under “—Products” and equity index-linked derivative transactions were entered into that are designed to mitigate the impact of a severe equity market stress event on the statutory capital of Prudential Financial and its subsidiaries, as whole. The program focuses on tail risk to protect statutory capital in a cost-effective manner under stress scenarios. Prudential Financial assesses the composition of the hedging program on an ongoing basis and may change it from time to time based on an evaluation of its risk position or other factors.
In addition to hedging equity market exposure, we also manage certain risks associated with our variable annuity products through hedging programs and affiliated reinsurance arrangements. Primarily in the reinsurance affiliate, interest rate derivatives and equity options and futures are purchased to hedge certain optional living benefit features accounted for as embedded derivatives against changes in equity markets, interest rates, and market volatility. Prior to third quarter of 2010, the hedging strategy sought to generally match the sensitivities of the embedded derivative liability as defined by GAAP, excluding the impact of the market-perceived risk of non-performance, with capital market derivatives. In the third quarter of 2010, the hedging strategy was revised as, in a low interest rate environment, management of the Company and reinsurance affiliates does not believe the GAAP value of the embedded derivative liability is an appropriate measure for determining the hedge target. For additional information regarding the change in hedging strategy see “Products”.
Certain of the Company’s variable annuity statutory reserves are ceded to an affiliated captive reinsurance company, Pruco Re. Historically. a reinsurance trust was required by the affiliated captive reinsurance company to satisfy reinsurance reserve credit requirements. As of July 1, 2011 the affiliated offshore captive reinsurance company was redomiciled from Bermuda to Arizona. As a result, beginning in the third quarter of 2011 the assets that support the statutory reserve credits for business reinsured to the captive from the Company are not required to be held in a trust.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
In order to ensure that the information we must disclose in our filings with the SEC, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of September 30, 2011. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. No change in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f), occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
62
Table of Contents
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
We are subject to legal and regulatory actions in the ordinary course of our businesses, including class action lawsuits. Our pending legal and regulatory actions may include proceedings specific to us and proceedings generally applicable to business practices in the industry in which we operate. We are also subject to litigation arising out of our general business activities, such as our investments, contracts, leases and labor and employment relationships, including claims of discrimination and harassment and could be exposed to claims or litigation concerning certain business or process patents. Regulatory authorities from time to time make inquiries and conduct investigations and examinations which may relate particularly to us and our products or to industry-wide issues or matters upon which such regulators have determined to focus. In some of our pending legal and regulatory actions, parties may seek large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive or exemplary damages.
In May 2011, the Company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings in Huffman v. The Prudential Insurance Company, a purported nationwide class action challenging the use of retained asset accounts to settle death benefit claims in ERISA-governed employee welfare plans. In July 2011, the court denied the motion.
Our litigation and regulatory matters are subject to many uncertainties, and given their complexity and scope, their outcome cannot be predicted. It is possible that our results of operations or cash flow in a particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by an ultimate unfavorable resolution of pending litigation or regulatory matters depending, in part, upon the results of operations or cash flow for such period. In light of the unpredictability of the Company’s litigation and regulatory matters, it is also possible that in certain cases an ultimate unfavorable resolution of one or more pending litigation or regulatory matters could have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Management believes, however, that based on information currently known to it, the ultimate outcome of all pending litigation and regulatory matters, after consideration of applicable reserves and rights to indemnification, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
As discussed under “Contingent Liabilities” above, the Company is subject to audits and inquiries concerning its handling of unclaimed property. During the third quarter of 2011, the Company increased reserves by $9 million for certain policies and contracts active at any time since January 1, 1992, in respect of which the Company expects a death benefit (including delayed claim interest) to be payable based upon the application of new SSMDF matching criteria and an assumption of death without receipt of a valid claim by or on behalf of a beneficiary or other claim documentation.
The foregoing discussion is limited to recent material developments concerning our legal and regulatory proceedings. See Note 6 to the Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for additional discussion of our litigation and regulatory matters, including the above matter.
You should carefully consider the risks described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These risks could materially affect our business, results of operations or financial condition, or cause our actual results to differ materially from those expected or those expressed in any forward looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company. These risks are not exclusive, and additional risks to which we are subject include, but are not limited to, the factors mentioned under “Forward-Looking Statements” above and the risks of our businesses described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
63
Table of Contents
| 31.1 | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | |
| 31.2 | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | |
| 32.1 | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | |
| 32.2 | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | |
| 101.INS | -XBRL Instance Document. | |
| 101.SCH | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
| 101.CAL | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.LAB | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.PRE | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.DEF | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
64
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Pruco Life Insurance Company | ||
| By: | /s/ THOMAS DIEMER | |
| Thomas Diemer | ||
| Chief Accounting Officer (Authorized Signatory and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) | ||
Date: November 14, 2011
65
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
| 31.1 | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | |
| 31.2 | Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | |
| 32.1 | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer. | |
| 32.2 | Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer. | |
| 101.INS | -XBRL Instance Document. | |
| 101.SCH | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
| 101.CAL | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.LAB | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.PRE | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
| 101.DEF | -XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
66